nanopi R6S / R6C changes

[Michel Lespinasse]

With 24.10.0 now out, is this the right time to ask for reviews for
this again ? And if accepted into main, is there still a chance to
push for backporting this into 24.10.1 ?

Thanks,

On Tue, Jan 21, 2025 at 03:25:23PM -0800, Michel Lespinasse wrote:
> I would like to request feedback on my github pull request at
> https://github.com/openwrt/openwrt/pull/17638
> 
> The intention there is to bring the nanopi R6S and R6C targets more in
> line with expectations one has of a generic openwrt device. The volume
> of changes is low, this is just:
> - device tree changes to configure the system LED and reset button behaviors;
> - setting up network IRQ affinity to the fast cores (as was already
>   done for the similarly configured nanopi R4S)
> - configuring R8169 module to be mentioned in /etc/module-boot.d
>   to avoid potential naming races with external hardware.
> 
> The changes are against main branch but to be honest, I think it would
> be good to have them in 24.10 branch too given their limited scope.
> 
> A prior test workflow completed with some errors, which seemed to be
> just internal to the test workflow itself (i.e. failures to fetch some
> files during the workflow execution). I just sent out a rebase, both
> to get rid of an undesired merge I had at the end of the previous
> request, and in hopes of getting a clean test workflow run this time :)