ULA prefix lifetime

[Christoph Hartmann]

It is what it is

sadly there is no use in complaining - I think we all can imagine our 
perfect provider ...


//chriss

On 11/21/24 07:54, Götz Görisch wrote:
> Michael,
>
>> :-(
>> {Your ISP should avoid that kind of thing; IPv6 being plentiful there is no
>> reason not to just statically allocate them all into the (radius) database,
>> and just renumber people when there are major re-balancing.}
> Michael,
>
> I agree with you, but due to old habits, no regulation and an old
> recommendation from Germany Privacy authorities, the ISP does that.
> Some are also marketing this as a feature.
> We still have ISPs which disconnect PPPoE sessions after 24h, with a
> new set of addresses, prefixes after the reconnect.
>
> There is now RFC 9096 which gives recommendations on how to handle
> such situations.
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc9096
>
> Haven't compared the patch with this RFC though myself, due to time constraints.
>
> - Goetz
>
> _______________________________________________
> openwrt-devel mailing list
> openwrt-devel at lists.openwrt.org
> https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel