[OpenWrt-Devel] Which image for the Nanostation Loco M2, WAS:Cannot flash UBNT Loco M2

[Matthias Schiffer]

On 03/11/2016 05:15 PM, Aaron Z wrote:
>  )On Fri, Mar 11, 2016 at 9:28 AM, Matthias Schiffer
> <mschiffer at universe-factory.net> wrote:
>> PS. Completely unrelated to this issue: I noticed in your log that you used
>> the wrong image ("nanostation" instead of "bullet") for your Loco. This
>> isn't really an issue, as the nanostation and bullet images only differ by
>> the number of ethernet ports they define, but you'll have a dead "eth1"
>> device. The image "nanostation" should used for the NanoStation (as it is
>> the only device with two ethernet ports), and "bullet" for everything from
>> the AirMax XM series except NanoStation and Rocket (Bullet, Loco,
>> PicoStation, ...)
> So, which should be used for the Nanostation Loco M2 (
> http://www.amazon.com/Ubiquiti-NanoStation-locoM2-2-4GHz-Outdoor/dp/B004EGI3CI/
> ) which has one Ethernet port?
> The one I have is an older (non-XW) device. For CC, I see:
> openwrt-15.05-ar71xx-generic-ubnt-bullet-m-squashfs-sysupgrade.bin and
> openwrt-15.05-ar71xx-generic-ubnt-nano-m-squashfs-sysupgrade.bin
> I had used the nano build, but it has a non-functional eth1 port.
> 
> Aaron Z

As I wrote, "bullet" is the correct image for all XM devices with one
ethernet port and no USB.

Matthias


-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 819 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/openwrt-devel/attachments/20160311/f51d71b7/attachment.sig>
-------------- next part --------------
_______________________________________________
openwrt-devel mailing list
openwrt-devel at lists.openwrt.org
https://lists.openwrt.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel