[OpenWrt-Devel] [PATCH] [brcm63xx] Add support for Plusnet 2704N

[Matt Goring]

Hello, sorry I did not explain myself correctly.
     $(eval $(call bcm63xxCfe,FAST2604 ,F at ST2604 ,fast2604 ,F at ST2604,...
     $(eval $(call bcm63xxCfe,FAST2704N,FAST2704N,fast2704n,F at ST2704N,...
If I use the the @ symbol in the 3rd argument (DEVICE_NAME), then the 
kernel does not boot any-more.
Looking at all the other builds, the device_name uses the same name as 
the board_id.

When I said board_id, I really meant the DEVICE_NAME.


On 30/07/2015 20:34, Jonas Gorski wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Tue, Jul 28, 2015 at 6:28 AM, Matt Goring <matt.goring at googlemail.com> wrote:
>> BCM6318: add support for Plusnet / Sagem 2704N (V1)
>> Signed-off-by: Matt Goring <matt.goring at googlemail.com>
>> ---
> For future submissions, add a changelog here for all the changes
> between (re-)submissions.
>
>>   target/linux/brcm63xx/base-files/etc/diag.sh       |    3 +
>>   .../brcm63xx/base-files/etc/uci-defaults/01_leds   |    3 +
>>   .../base-files/etc/uci-defaults/02_network         |    1 +
>>   target/linux/brcm63xx/base-files/lib/brcm63xx.sh   |    3 +
>>   target/linux/brcm63xx/dts/fast2704n.dts            |   84 ++++++++++++++++++++
>>   target/linux/brcm63xx/image/Makefile               |    2 +
>>   .../patches-3.18/571-board_fast2704n.patch         |   65 +++++++++++++++
>>   .../brcm63xx/patches-4.1/571-board_fast2704n.patch |   65 +++++++++++++++
>>   target/linux/brcm63xx/profiles/sagem.mk            |   10 +++
>>   9 files changed, 236 insertions(+)
>>   create mode 100644 target/linux/brcm63xx/dts/fast2704n.dts
>>   create mode 100644 target/linux/brcm63xx/patches-3.18/571-board_fast2704n.patch
>>   create mode 100644 target/linux/brcm63xx/patches-4.1/571-board_fast2704n.patch
>>
>> --- a/target/linux/brcm63xx/image/Makefile
>> +++ b/target/linux/brcm63xx/image/Makefile
>> @@ -623,6 +623,8 @@ $(eval $(call bcm63xxCfe,FAST2404,F at ST2404,fast2404,F at ST2404,6348))
>>   $(eval $(call bcm63xxCfe,FAST2504n,F at ST2504n,fast2504n,F at ST2504n,6362))
>>   # Sagem F at ST2604
>>   $(eval $(call bcm63xxCfe,FAST2604,F at ST2604,fast2604,F at ST2604,6348))
>> +# Sagem F at ST2704N V1 / Plusnet F at ST2704N V1
>> +$(eval $(call bcm63xxCfe,FAST2704N,FAST2704N,fast2704n,F at ST2704N,6318,--pad 4))
> I thought using F at ST2704N as the board name in the image does not work?
>
> Rest looks fine.
>
>
> Jonas
>
_______________________________________________
openwrt-devel mailing list
openwrt-devel at lists.openwrt.org
https://lists.openwrt.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel