[vote] Update OpenWrt rules
David Bauer
mail at david-bauer.net
Tue Nov 4 03:02:12 PST 2025
Hi Hauke,
thanks for taking care of this task.
I fully agree.
+1 from me
Best
Davie
Am 23. Oktober 2025 21:40:30 MESZ schrieb Hauke Mehrtens <hauke at hauke-m.de>:
>Hi,
>
>I propose to replace the current OpenWrt rules to the below version.
>This is an official vote. The vote should conclude on 27th November 2025.
>
>These are the old rules: https://openwrt.org/rules
>
>This vote follows the old rules. It needs a two third approval rate among all OpenWrt project members to get accepted.
>
>
>Voting page: https://openwrt.org/voting/2025-10-23-rule-update
>
>Hauke
>
>----------
># Proposed OpenWrt Rules - June 2025
>
>_**Membership**_
>
>* The roles within the OpenWrt project are:
> active members, inactive members, and non-members.
> There is no core developer group or any other
> group of specially privileged members.
>* Members may voluntarily switch between active and inactive status at
> any time.
>* If a member appears not to be participating in project matters,
> any active member may request that the non-participating
> member switch to inactive status.
> This request must be sent by email to the person concerned,
> with the openwrt-adm mailing list in CC.
> If the person either agrees or does not respond within 30 days,
> they will be moved to inactive status.
>* Frequent contributors may become members after a simple approval.
> Project members are free to propose suitable candidates.
>
>_**Commit access**_
>
>* Active members can request commit access to all repositories.
>* The commit credentials of inactive members can be revoked.
> They will be restored upon their return to active status.
>
>_**Voting**_
>
>* All active members have the right to vote and are encouraged
> to liberally exercise this voting right in order to
> maintain a broad consensus on project matters.
>* To propose changes to project matters or the overall development
> direction, a formal proposal must be sent to the openwrt-adm mailing
> list.
> The proposal must clearly describe the suggested changes
> and include a specific deadline for when the voting period will end.
> A simple approval is required.
>* All active members who participate in the new vote or voted in the
> past 6 months before the new vote was started are considered active
> voters.
> If less than 3 votes occurred in the past 6 months the last 3 votes
> are considered to determine the active voters.
>* For a simple approval, the proposal must achieve a two-thirds majority
> among the active members who participate in the vote.
> Additionally, it must receive approval from at least 50% of the active
> voters, regardless of whether they participated in the vote.
>* For a change to these rules, a 75% majority among the active members
> who participate in the vote must approve,
> as well as 50% approval from the active voters.
>* Neutral votes are considered half-approvals.
>* Any votes and decisions will be made public on the project website.
>
>_**Infrastructure**_
>
>* Project infrastructure should be outsourced to FOSS community operated
> services whenever possible in order to allow members
> to focus on actual development efforts.
>* Any infrastructure that is operated by the project
> itself shall be administered by at least three different people
> to reduce the likelihood of the project getting locked out
> due to administrators being unreachable.
>* Responsible administrators for the various services shall be
> documented publicly.
>
>_**Other rules**_
>
>* The project will not offer individual email accounts
> under its project domain for privacy and equality reasons.
>* Be nice to each other (formerly known as "Rule 12")
>
>_______________________________________________
>openwrt-adm mailing list
>openwrt-adm at lists.openwrt.org
>https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-adm
More information about the openwrt-adm
mailing list