Revising OpenWrt Rules

[Sam Kuper]

On Sun, Oct 04, 2020 at 10:35:45PM +0100, Sam Kuper wrote:
> It's great if the decisionmakers are already trustworthy.  Requiring
> decisions to be made (or at least ratified) transparently will help to
> keep them that way.

I phrased poorly the opening sentence of that paragraph.  What I meant
was: "If the decisions are currently trustworthy, that's great."

(Also: I'm not trying to imply that any current or past OpenWRT
decisionmakers are or were untrustworthy.  But who knows what some
future decisionmaker might be like?  So I'm just proposing a way to
harmlessly minimise avoidable future risks to the project.)

-- 
A: When it messes up the order in which people normally read text.
Q: When is top-posting a bad thing?

()  ASCII ribbon campaign. Please avoid HTML emails & proprietary
/\  file formats. (Why? See e.g. https://v.gd/jrmGbS ). Thank you.