OpenWrt/LEDE remerge/rebrand status

[Roman Yeryomin]

On 21 March 2017 at 02:48, Imre Kaloz <kaloz at openwrt.org> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 2017-03-20 16:58, Florian Fainelli wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> Here is a summary of the people's opinion regarding the OpenWrt/LEDE
>> remerge/rebrand questions as formulated here initially by John [1].
>>
>> Here is what I counted so far from the link above.
>>
>> - Re-merge:
>>         * Yes: Alexandru, Stijn, Mathias, Alvaro, Rafal, Piotr, Matthias
>> S.,
>> Daniel, Hans, John, Zoltan, Vincenzo, Felix, Luka, Matteo, Florian
>>         * Neutral: Jo-Philip
>>
>> - Re-brand LEDE to OpenWrt:
>>         * neutral: Alexandru, Stijn, Alvaro, Piotr, Matthias S., Daniel,
>> Hans,
>> John, Vincenzo, Felix
>>         * No: Mathias, Rafal, Alexander C., Jo
>>         * Yes: Zoltan, Luka, Matteo, Florian
>>
>> [1]: http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/lede-adm/2017-March/000402.html
>>
>> In terms of numbers:
>>
>> - in favor of a re-merge: 15
>> - neutral to a re-merge: 1
>>
>> - in favor of re-branding LEDE to OpenWrt: 4
>> - neutral to that: 10
>> - against re-branding LEDE to OpenWrt: 4
>
>
> I didn't vote yet like quite a few others. I'll reach out to the remaining
> people on our side as it might not have been clear for them they actually do
> have LEDE voting rights (afterall, this is a vote with the LEDE hat on). I
> would like to ask John or Felix to do the same as well on that note.
>
> My vote is (not so surprisingly) "yes" on both questions.
>

Florian, not sure if my vote counts (I hope it does) but seems my
email didn't make it to lede-adm list because of: "Too many recipients
to the message"
I wouldn't suspect that 10 is "too many" :/

Regards,
Roman