[LEDE-ADM] License of patches
Ted Hess
thess at kitschensync.net
Tue Apr 26 12:29:13 EDT 2016
Makes sense to me.
Patches inherit the license of the source code base they are individually applied to and are not, by themselves 'copyrighted or
licensed', correct?
/ted
-----Original Message-----
From: Jo-Philipp Wich
Sent: Tuesday, April 26, 2016 10:28 AM
To: lede-adm at lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [LEDE-ADM] License of patches
Hi,
> I would like to add this to the rules or to the patch submission
> guideline:
>
> -------------------------------
> Patches done to an existing software are always licensed under the
> same licenses as the original source code if it is not explicitly
> stated different. This should ensure that it possible to include the
> changes into the upstream project.
> -------------------------------
No objections from me.
~ Jo
_______________________________________________
lede-adm mailing list
lede-adm at lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/lede-adm
More information about the openwrt-adm
mailing list