abuse at basmevissen.nl
Tue Sep 13 14:00:58 PDT 2022
On 2022-09-13 21:56, Jo-Philipp Wich wrote:
>> IMHO changing, in /etc/config/network:
>> "config interface" -> "config network"
>> "config device" -> "config interface"
>> would eliminate this semantic inconsistency and bring the naming
>> convention more in line with what Rich referred to in his comments
> This cannot be done in a sane manner though as it would render future
> entirely backwards incompatible.
> Renaming `config interface` to `config network` makes sense and can be
> implemented easily. However we would still need to treat `config
> interface` as
> synonym for it in the forseeable future in order to retain
> which means that we cannot reuse `interface` for something else.
> So changing `config interface` to `config network` would be possible
> that `config device` remains `config device` (or is renamed to
> something other
> than `interface`).
> At the same time, the `wifi-iface` section type in /e/c/network should
> changed to `wifi-network` in order to remain consistent.
When you are at this level of changes and redefining and reusing names,
normally it is time to reconsider the complete thing.
I would suggest something like a JSON file based config with versioning
so that later changes can be done in a forward compatible way.
With some clever scripts, not too exotic existing configurations can be
converted automatically, just like was done with the switch to DSA.
Just my 2 cents..
> ~ Jo
> openwrt-devel mailing list
> openwrt-devel at lists.openwrt.org
More information about the openwrt-devel