[OpenWrt-Devel] ath79 policy questions

[Lech Perczak]

Hello Daniel,

Answers inline.

W dniu 2018-09-12 o 04:24, Daniel F. Dickinson pisze:
> Hi,
>
> I'm having trouble finding a concise summary of what is the policy for 
> using multiple leds for boot/failsafe, etc status (in this case 
> updating CAP324 to use both colours of the 'power' led, now that such 
> logic in in ath79 tree).
>
> Also are leds supposed to be named according to manufacturer or 
> according to model number (presuming that for ath79 we don't care 
> about using the same led names as for ar71xx)?
IIRC most targets use same names as for ar71xx. I'd go and review a few 
other device trees for supported devices and check  that, to maintain 
consistency across the target.
>
> Also pursuant to https://github.com/openwrt/openwrt/pull/1062 should 
> CAP324 be DHCP or a static IP on it's only wired interface?  (It's an 
> AP).
Since no decision regarding that PR was made by maintainers yet, I 
believe the old policy is still in effect. I don't think that your 
changes should depend on this one, and IMHO consistency is more 
important here.
>
> Regards,
>
> Daniel
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> openwrt-devel mailing list
> openwrt-devel at lists.openwrt.org
> https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel

--
With kind regards,
Lech


_______________________________________________
openwrt-devel mailing list
openwrt-devel at lists.openwrt.org
https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel