[TODO] release considerations

Hauke Mehrtens hauke at hauke-m.de
Fri Jun 3 15:56:16 EDT 2016

On 06/03/2016 10:45 AM, Vincenzo Romano wrote:
> 2016-06-03 10:34 GMT+02:00 John Crispin <john at phrozen.org>:
>> * decide which targets to include
> I'd suggest for a survey or some other information about popularity.
> It sounds useless at this stage to cover architectures that weigh less
> than 5% to 10%.
>> * a name
>>  - keep the year.month.minor pattern ?
>>  - do we want codenames ?
> I vote against codenames as it's just cosmetic, fancy and basically a
> loss of time.
> YYYY.MM.mm is just ok. Even YY.MM.mm can be OK at least for the next 80+ years.

As long as some developer takes care of the release and tests it I think
we should integrate it. I assume building one target more is not the big
problem, but testing and fixing bugs is.

@John what is the status of the test reporting tool you are working on?


More information about the openwrt-adm mailing list