[TODO] release considerations

[Daniel Golle]

On Fri, Jun 03, 2016 at 10:45:07AM +0200, Vincenzo Romano wrote:
> 2016-06-03 10:34 GMT+02:00 John Crispin <john at phrozen.org>:
> > * decide which targets to include
> 
> I'd suggest for a survey or some other information about popularity.
> It sounds useless at this stage to cover architectures that weigh less
> than 5% to 10%.


I reckon the << ar7/ac49x >> can safely be phased out. I didn't manage
to boot anything recently on my MP-202 rev. B03 device... If I still
get to test John's staging tree which includes the bump to kernel 4.4,
I'll let you know.
<< oxnas >> generally works fine apart from a weird bug preventing the
NAND from being discovered and the chip probed at least on some
Pogoplug devices. The issue might be probing-order or pinctrl related,
I hope to figure it out in the next weeks somehow.


> 
> > * a name
> >  - keep the year.month.minor pattern ?
> >  - do we want codenames ?
> 
> I vote against codenames as it's just cosmetic, fancy and basically a
> loss of time.
> YYYY.MM.mm is just ok. Even YY.MM.mm can be OK at least for the next 80+ years.
> 
> _______________________________________________
> lede-adm mailing list
> lede-adm at lists.infradead.org
> http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/lede-adm