fluent-bit dependency on musl-fts not conditional?

Rosen Penev rosenp at gmail.com
Sun Jun 14 17:46:21 PDT 2026


On Sun, Jun 14, 2026 at 3:51 PM Philip Prindeville via openwrt-devel
<openwrt-devel at lists.openwrt.org> wrote:
>
> The sender domain has a DMARC Reject/Quarantine policy which disallows
> sending mailing list messages using the original "From" header.
>
> To mitigate this problem, the original message has been wrapped
> automatically by the mailing list software.
>
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: Philip Prindeville <philipp_subx at redfish-solutions.com>
> To: openwrt-devel <openwrt-devel at lists.openwrt.org>
> Cc:
> Bcc:
> Date: Sun, 14 Jun 2026 16:05:06 -0600
> Subject: fluent-bit dependency on musl-fts not conditional?
> Looking at the other places where there's a dependency on musl-fts it's usually gated:
>
> +USE_MUSL:musl-fts
>
> But not for fluent-bit.  Same with nnn.  Is this an oversight?
Probably, I doubt anyone builds with glibc.
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> openwrt-devel mailing list
> openwrt-devel at lists.openwrt.org
> https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel



More information about the openwrt-devel mailing list