[VOTE] OpenWrt Two

David Woodhouse dwmw2 at infradead.org
Fri Oct 10 00:59:43 PDT 2025


On Thu, 2025-10-09 at 19:51 +0100, Daniel Golle wrote:
> 
> > 
> > But on the Two, it's going to matter more. I'd really want the PoE to
> > be on one of the four 2.5G ports attached to the switch, and *not* the
> > single port. Otherwise there's going to be a lot more software bridging
> > than necessary...
> 
> Thanks to 'bridger'[1] it is easy to avoid CPU-intense "software bridging"
> from happening on MediaTek platforms which comes with MediaTek's PPE
> offloading engine.
> 
> [1]: https://github.com/nbd168/bridger

Nice. Does this work out of the box if I just configure a given VLAN on
both ports using LUCI?

And in particular with the tagged VLAN trunk on the single (PoE) port,
bridging to individual VLANs untagged on the quad/dual ports? 
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/pkcs7-signature
Size: 5069 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.openwrt.org/pipermail/openwrt-devel/attachments/20251010/940e0c8a/attachment.p7s>


More information about the openwrt-devel mailing list