Clarify Project Policy on Default Writes to NVRAM

Enrico Mioso mrkiko.rs at gmail.com
Sat Aug 23 08:19:45 PDT 2025


On Sat, Aug 23, 2025 at 02:04:40PM +0200, Thibaut wrote:
> 
> 
> > Le 23 août 2025 à 13:42, Christian Marangi (Ansuel) <ansuelsmth at gmail.com> a écrit :
> > 
> > Il giorno sab 23 ago 2025 alle ore 13:27 Thibaut <hacks at slashdirt.org>
> > ha scritto:
> >> 
> >> As I was pointing out earlier, how many users do you think actually « reboot » their devices? (outside of OpenWrt devs, that is ;P)
> >> 
> >> Panics are pretty irrelevant because the elephant in the room is it’s either going to be power loss, i.e. « let’s unplug it » (or actual power loss, even) or « it doesn’t work, let’s turn it off and on again », at which point a reboot (or more precisely a *shutdown*) handler will be totally useless.
> >> 
> > 
> > Well then we should follow John idea and make it configurable. Maybe
> > we can enable it for eMMC by default?
> 
> Sounds good to me :)

I totally agree.
I think this is the sanest thing to do, because - in my view - the system should try to be resilient to what happens, not self-destruct slowly over time.
No, I don't think I am exhagerating here - for most devices, any write is just a step toward becoming ewaste, and in my opinion the user is the most entitled to decide on this matter, enabling/disabling this configuration as they see fit, depending on their tradeofs.
Having different defaults per technology is also sensible, being NOR so different from eMMC and so on...

> T.
> _______________________________________________
> openwrt-devel mailing list
> openwrt-devel at lists.openwrt.org
> https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel



More information about the openwrt-devel mailing list