Purpose of openwrt-devel?
Chuanhong Guo
gch981213 at gmail.com
Tue Mar 12 23:30:30 PDT 2024
On Wed, Mar 13, 2024 at 12:13 PM Elliott Mitchell <ehem+openwrt at m5p.com> wrote:
>
> On Wed, Mar 13, 2024 at 01:55:07AM +0100, Robert Marko wrote:
> > On Wed, 13 Mar 2024 at 01:36, Elliott Mitchell <ehem+openwrt at m5p.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > Well, what purpose does the openwrt-devel mailing list serve?
> > >
> > > As near as I can tell it looks suspiciously like it is a method to divert
> > > developers from where everything is done. There isn't too much review
> > > activity. Anything which does get a positive review tends to simply
> > > disappear unless it is later resubmitted via GitHub.
> > >
> > > According to https://openwrt.org/submitting-patches patch submission via
> > > GitHub or the openwrt-devel mailing list can be done. The amount of text
> > > seems to suggest the mailing list is preferred. Yet, can anyone cite a
> > > single patch which was sent to the mailing list, reviewed positively and
> > > brought into the main branch without resubmitting via GitHub?
https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/project/openwrt/list/?state=3&archive=both¶m=2&page=1
>
> > Both methods of submitting changes are accepted.
>
> I must challenge this. If patches via the mailing list were accepted,
> then we should see things sent to the mailing list getting into the
> repository. Yet many patches get no attention. Some get reviews from
> various people, yet then never get into the main repository.
There are a lot of GitHub pull requests that nobody feels like merging,
too. Patches are piling up at both places and I don't think this is a
mailing-list specific problem.
--
Regards,
Chuanhong Guo
More information about the openwrt-devel
mailing list