OpenWrt Next Generation Ideas
Rui Salvaterra
rsalvaterra at gmail.com
Sat Apr 1 00:35:52 PDT 2023
Hi, everyone!
On Fri, 31 Mar 2023 at 22:28, Daniel Golle <daniel at makrotopia.org> wrote:
>
[snipped]
> The point here is not optimization, but finding a good compromise to
> not having to compile **all** packages for **all** CPU architectures.
> The same is btw also true for MIPS and ARM targets. We pick a good
> compromise in terms of optimization.
> Example:
> * All MIPS32 targets use either mips4k or mips24k optimization --
> in reality there are plenty of mips34k and mips1004k SoCs around,
> all of them happily run either of the two variants, but one could
> of course produce an optimized build for e.g. mips1004kc or even
> mips24kec...
Actually, I wonder if we should just stop pretending 34Kc and
1004Kc-specific optimisations exist. Internally, GCC uses the 24Kc
pipeline description for both 34Kc and 1004Kc (which makes sense,
since they're just 24Kc's with SMT and/or multiple cores).
Cheers,
Rui
More information about the openwrt-devel
mailing list