20.xx: postponse LuCI HTTPS per default

Paul Oranje por at oranjevos.nl
Fri Nov 27 17:54:31 EST 2020



> Op 20 nov. 2020, om 11:44 heeft Petr Štetiar <ynezz at true.cz> het volgende geschreven:
> 
> Paul Spooren <mail at aparcar.org> [2020-11-19 13:09:02]:
> 
> Hi,
> 
>> while 20.xx seems close, 
> 
> I don't share your view on this one, 21.xx is close, yes :-) Just being
> realistic here. So I would say, that if this issue should be tackled, there is
> still some time left to do so.
> 
>> I'd like to suggest to postponse HTTPS LuCI (`luci-ssl` vs `luci`) per
>> default.
> 
> Do we need to make this hard decission? Can't we leave it to the end users?
> We need most of the SSL stuff for other parts, so why not benefit from that in
> other parts?
> 
> For the start, can't we simply introduce some first time welcome page on HTTP,
> explain to the user, that HTTPS is available, the pros and cons of this
> solution and let the user decide?
> 
> In less intrusive way, this welcome page/wizard could be replaced with some
> information box "HTTPS is just a moments away", so the user would need to
> explicitly request that HTTPS feature.
> 
> There might be some better UX approach, but please try hard to move forward,
> not backward :-)

right, so +1

> 
> -- ynezz
> 
> _______________________________________________
> openwrt-devel mailing list
> openwrt-devel at lists.openwrt.org
> https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel




More information about the openwrt-devel mailing list