[OpenWrt-Devel] Lantiq DTS rename

Hauke Mehrtens hauke at hauke-m.de
Sun Dec 15 12:11:23 EST 2019


On 12/15/19 5:53 PM, mail at adrianschmutzler.de wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> how would you call the SOC variable in image Makefile then? (the equivalent to ATH_SOC and MTK_SOC...)
> 
> Best
> 
> Adrian

Lantiq currently has these 3:
CONFIG_SOC_AMAZON_SE
CONFIG_SOC_XWAY
CONFIG_SOC_FALCON

I would use these as a config options like CONFIG_ATH79 for the ath790
target.

as SOC names you can use these:
amazonse_
danube_
ar9_
vr9_
falcon_

Hauke


> 
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: openwrt-devel [mailto:openwrt-devel-bounces at lists.openwrt.org]
>> On Behalf Of Hauke Mehrtens
>> Sent: Sonntag, 15. Dezember 2019 14:49
>> To: Daniel Golle <daniel at makrotopia.org>; mail at adrianschmutzler.de
>> Cc: Martin Blumenstingl <martin.blumenstingl at googlemail.com>; openwrt-
>> devel at lists.openwrt.org
>> Subject: Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] Lantiq DTS rename
>>
>> On 12/15/19 2:27 PM, Daniel Golle wrote:
>>> Hi Adrian,
>>>
>>> On Sun, Dec 15, 2019 at 02:10:14PM +0100, mail at adrianschmutzler.de
>> wrote:
>>>> Hi,
>>>>
>>>> I consider doing a DTS rename for lantiq target similar to what it's like on
>> ath79 and what I did for ramips earlier that year.
>>>>
>>>> However, I wonder whether the "soc_vendor_model.dts" scheme is
>> useful there, or whether it wouldn't be better to just use
>> "vendor_model.dts" ...
>>>>
>>>> Any thoughts on this or any NAK in general?
>>>
>>> soc_vendor_model should be appropriate here is well. why not?
>>
>> Yes please clean this up and use the soc_vendor_model model, I think this is
>> the common format in the Linux kernel.
>>
>> Be aware that there is a pull request from Martin pending with some changes
>> to the existing files:
>> https://github.com/openwrt/openwrt/pull/2216
>>
>> Please also move the dts files into the lantiq subfolder at
>> arch/mips/boot/dts/lantiq/
>>
>> Hauke
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> openwrt-devel mailing list
>> openwrt-devel at lists.openwrt.org
>> https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel


-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 488 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/openwrt-devel/attachments/20191215/f38142e1/attachment.sig>
-------------- next part --------------
_______________________________________________
openwrt-devel mailing list
openwrt-devel at lists.openwrt.org
https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel


More information about the openwrt-devel mailing list