[OpenWrt-Devel] Lantiq DTS rename

[mail at adrianschmutzler.de]

Hi,

how would you call the SOC variable in image Makefile then? (the equivalent to ATH_SOC and MTK_SOC...)

Best

Adrian

> -----Original Message-----
> From: openwrt-devel [mailto:openwrt-devel-bounces at lists.openwrt.org]
> On Behalf Of Hauke Mehrtens
> Sent: Sonntag, 15. Dezember 2019 14:49
> To: Daniel Golle <daniel at makrotopia.org>; mail at adrianschmutzler.de
> Cc: Martin Blumenstingl <martin.blumenstingl at googlemail.com>; openwrt-
> devel at lists.openwrt.org
> Subject: Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] Lantiq DTS rename
> 
> On 12/15/19 2:27 PM, Daniel Golle wrote:
> > Hi Adrian,
> >
> > On Sun, Dec 15, 2019 at 02:10:14PM +0100, mail at adrianschmutzler.de
> wrote:
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> I consider doing a DTS rename for lantiq target similar to what it's like on
> ath79 and what I did for ramips earlier that year.
> >>
> >> However, I wonder whether the "soc_vendor_model.dts" scheme is
> useful there, or whether it wouldn't be better to just use
> "vendor_model.dts" ...
> >>
> >> Any thoughts on this or any NAK in general?
> >
> > soc_vendor_model should be appropriate here is well. why not?
> 
> Yes please clean this up and use the soc_vendor_model model, I think this is
> the common format in the Linux kernel.
> 
> Be aware that there is a pull request from Martin pending with some changes
> to the existing files:
> https://github.com/openwrt/openwrt/pull/2216
> 
> Please also move the dts files into the lantiq subfolder at
> arch/mips/boot/dts/lantiq/
> 
> Hauke
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: openpgp-digital-signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 834 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/openwrt-devel/attachments/20191215/6c9c079d/attachment.sig>
-------------- next part --------------
_______________________________________________
openwrt-devel mailing list
openwrt-devel at lists.openwrt.org
https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel