[OpenWrt-Devel] ath10k-ct 4.19 and IBSS

Ben Greear greearb at candelatech.com
Fri Aug 9 11:31:05 EDT 2019


On 8/9/19 7:14 AM, Koen Vandeputte wrote:
> 
> On 09.08.19 15:31, Koen Vandeputte wrote:
>>
>> On 09.08.19 14:48, Ben Greear wrote:
>>> On 8/6/19 2:26 AM, Koen Vandeputte wrote:
>>>
>>>>>> Hi Ben,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I finally managed to get to some time to properly take a look using a simple setup.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Attached all required files to simulate the issue.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I compiled the latest OpenWrt master state, (included a full wpa_supplicant and iperf tools) and ran the 2 starts.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Attached also logs as seen from both boards simultaneously.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> basically:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> - If the boards finally do link after lots of tries, it will have a >200ms latency and max speed of about 3Mbit.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> - The wpa_sup config file is the most basic RSN enabled config.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> - I also tried the current Master state with/without all custom pathes, but the result is the same.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> - wpa_supp also nags about some missing IE's
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Hw used:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> - 2x RB-922UAGS containing a on-board ar988x, capable of 30dBm.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> - 2x standard 5GHz omni antennae
>>>>>>
>>>>>> - board seperation distance ca 6ft
>>>
>>> Can you reproduce without encryption enabled?  That makes it easier to debug
>>> packet sniffs.
>>>
>>> If you just run ping traffic (or very slow speed tcp/udp), do you still see the issues (like high
>>> latency, packet loss, poor on-air encoding rates, etc)?
>>>
>> currently rebuilding the setup. will get back on this asap.
>>> If I build you a debugging firmware, are you able and willing to reproduce the problem and
>>> send me dmesg output as well as on-air packet sniff?
>> Very sure!
>>>
>>> Preferably, with generated traffic with unique packet sizes (ie, ever increasing, random, or something like
>>> that, so I can more easily match up on-air frames with the debugging output.
>>>
>>>
>>> I believe that the beacon issues are probably a symptom of some other failure in the transmit and/or
>>> receive path.
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> Ben
>>>
>> Lets get this fixed! :-)
>>
>> Koen
>>
> 
> Just tested with encryption disabled:
> 
> summary:
> 
> - speed is looking good. (~130Mbit/s) also link speed is 866Mbit (2x2 radio)
> 
> - iw wlan0 confirms 80MHz channel
> 
> - Only a single splat seen, no beacon errors
> 
> - non-htt firmware


Please see this bug I opened to track this.  It has a firmware debugging image.
In case it crashes on FW load, we will have to create and tweak a fwcfg file
to decrease number of vdevs, peers, etc since the debugging code uses a lot of
instruction space.

https://github.com/greearb/ath10k-ct/issues/88

Thanks,
Ben

-- 
Ben Greear <greearb at candelatech.com>
Candela Technologies Inc  http://www.candelatech.com


_______________________________________________
openwrt-devel mailing list
openwrt-devel at lists.openwrt.org
https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel


More information about the openwrt-devel mailing list