[LEDE-DEV] the ipv6 issues and the notions of timer
dave.taht at gmail.com
Mon Jan 23 22:33:16 PST 2017
I have been poking all over the stack on a lede build from thursday,
and I think many of the issues we've been having with ipv6 for a year
now have involved not setting various timers correctly in the kernel,
from various places they needed to be set by.
Also the linux kernel added the new notion of mgmtempaddrs and
noprefixroute over the past 2 years or so. lede seems to be defaulting
to noprefixroute (which seems to be the right idea) but that is not
the default in things like my ubuntu system, and this mild change
(where adding an address/64 used to add a route/64), may also be
causing certain things to fail.
In surveying the carnage:
iproute2 added the ability to set "ip route ... expires X" in 4.5, but
it was not in 4.4, and not done correctly until 4.7. Not sure if it
was busted in the kernel also...
there are also weird dependencies in ip -6 addr if you try to set
preferred_lft independently of valid_lft. these always should be
modified together for sane results.
For ula globals it has never set a leasetime or route expires in the
kernel. It probably should (and default to something like 20 minutes
otherwise), and periodically refresh the associated addresses and
distributed routes for that. (or punt to something else to do it)
netifd also has a a notion of "wallclock" time, where I'm not sure
what is supposed to happen if stuff starts before time is slewed
forward for the first time by ntp, or *as* time is being slewed.
netifd does appear to be trying to set valid_lft, preferred_lft, but
seems to be failing in many cases.
# Most of the /lib/netifd/protos do not bother trying to set a timer,
when they should
* /lib/netifd/dhcpv6.script (called by odhcp6c)
I successfully modified this to actually pass valid_lft and
preferred_lft to the kernel by using the full syntax for
(this was my first clue that netifd was supposed to actually be
writing timer related info to the kernel. It does keep preferred and
valid correctly in ifstatus whatever.)
relevant bit was:
for entry in $ADDRESSES; do
# Override these so we can watch what happens between refreshes
[ "$preferred" -gt "1600" ] && preferred=1600
[ "$valid" -gt "1800" ] && valid=1800
proto_add_ipv6_address "$addr" "$mask" "$preferred" "$valid" 1
despite mucho hacking the exact same syntax as above for
Also it is not being triggered at all when the underlying lease on the
interface is renewed by udhcp. The underlying addresses do change...
my udhcp lease is 600 seconds, and advertising an infinite lifetime to
other hosts is kind of bad, 'cause it's changed 3 times in the last
day alone.... There's 3 kinds of cruft in the code going back years...
# The various other things for route timers syntactically
(proto_add_ipv6_route proto_add_ipv6_prefix) appear correct, but:
generally do not work. (and are not being used) Also the separator
syntax (being of slashes) is not the best, commas would be saner, I
think, to parse. There's at least one error in the 6rd code where we
end up with an extra /60/60 that is mere matter of luck that parses
So far as I understand odhcpd gets stuff via ubus and punts some of it
back that way. It seems to be working for dhcpv6 (but does supplies
infinite leases until you convince odhcp6c to get addresses defined
with shorter leases)
and netifd corresponds over ubus...
I've noted elsewhere odhcpd (bug 388) gets completely wedged if you
hit it with a couple odhcp-pd requests and starts only periodically
offering ras. It also loses track of its internal lease table....
* dnsmasq dhcpv6
kind of depends on there being timers for the addresses on the link
that it is offering addresses for to route, and I don't know if it
thinks about the noprefixroute concept and routes/addresses
* I haven't even tried to figure out if slaac is working right.
# some further ra issues
Also installs a ton of dhcpv6 static routes that make pretty good
sense for a default gw to an ISP, but not for an interior one. It
won't announce a ra by itself... relying on another daemon to decide
to do so.
It does not seem to listen to further ra's on the link it is listening
on (for more specific routes on it's gateway). You unfortunately
cannot rely just on dhcpv6 for routes in ipv6.
we use source specific routing to only allow for it's assigned
prefixes to exit (good thing, no bcp38 needed), which means we do not
install a default ra to the universe because ra's don't do source
specific announcements (Although there is a proposal slowly drifting
through the ietf on the matter).
* the static route problem also gets in the way when you have two
dhcp-pd clients - they end up essentially in ap isolation mode when no
default route is also present. The "righter" answer is to be
announcing your interior router's subnet offlink via, but not a
* accept_ra 2 is no longer accepted syntax in uci. Using this
(carefully) covered a multitude of sins in the good ole days (2013).
It can still be set via sysctl, and helps (For now) in a couple
# Next steps for all concerned for whoever wants to chip in.
*backport the relevant expires fixes for iproute2 (or just upgrade it to head)
*look over the in-kernel interfaces for ipv6 timer and for any route
*also review noprefixroute stuff
*make netifd do saner things with timers and ulas
*review the netlink apis and usages in the various odh* utils
*review the protos and make sure they are passing the right things and
are getting the right events and hooked to the right stuff, getting
correctly into ifstatus and elsewhere.
(I just did 6rd and dhcpv6 - anyone for he? pppoe? 6to4? gre? homenet?)
*add some error checking and optional logging to anything writing or
reading netlink. Everywhere.
* write some documentation on how netifd/ubus/odh*/uci is supposed to
interact in the first place. With pictures. I have 30+ pages of notes
at this point, and dozens of packet captures, screen shots, and route
I'd love a "simple ubus listen daemon example - one that listens
merely for events on a set of interfaces. or routes or on a proto".
For all I know there's better tools for looking at ubus but my head
spins from installing my post-eyeball json checker. I'd like to for
example be checking that everything is always correctly formatted json
passing through... is there a way to do that? While, like, um,
and then there's this long list of needed features for odchpd,
bringing dnsmasq more up to snuff, and...
the original bug 388 I started with, which I kind of hope will yield
to fixing several of the above....
But I'd settle for first getting a solid notion of timers throughout
the stack, actually
working, and setting them to really low values to see them actually do
Let's go make home routers and wifi faster! With better software!
More information about the Lede-dev