[OpenWrt-Devel] Response to LEDE proposal/queries/mail?

[Eric Schultz]

Zoltan,

I'm pleased to hear there's been some movement. Does this mean that OpenWrt
is going to have releases while LEDE will not?

Eric

On Tue, Jun 7, 2016 at 7:42 AM, Zoltan HERPAI <wigyori at uid0.hu> wrote:

> Daniel Dickinson wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I had a few emails on this topic I thought better of sending, but I'm
>> sure I'm not the only one wondering why the remaining OpenWrt devs have
>> not responded to the various LEDE overtures on this mailing list.  Is it
>> lack of time, an unwillingness to attempt to have an honest and
>> reasonable dialogue in public, or something else?  I admit that for all
>> the furor over the fork, and complaints about LEDE lack of transparency
>> in the fork, I'm seeing a lot more communication from LEDE than from the
>> remaining devs, and am left to guess the reasons why (although with my
>> mechanism to help me avoid bad emails, I don't give voice to my tendency
>> to the less than generous suspicions, now).
>>
>>
>
> Hi Daniel,
>
> May I ask you to point to which e-mail are you referring to? We are yet to
> see an official line from LEDE on what they want to see to happen in
> OpenWrt (setting aside the FUD some LEDE members have shown on the list).
> The IRC discussion did not happen due to being unable to work out the
> timezone differences, the conversation on the mailing list did not move
> forward - this is obviously an issue on our side as well.
>
> The official line - which I should have sent out a few days ago - from the
> OpenWrt team is:
> ----
>
> Felix's initial comment was LEDE to become a "development environment" for
> new ideas, and to keep OpenWrt as the standard distro. We have stayed away
> from committing to OpenWrt trunk to keep a clean sheet according to this,
> to let LEDE members cleanly and easily merge their changes. (Apologies to
> all contributors for not pushing their patches so far). Luka - as no
> objections but only praises were received - plans to do the proposed github
> move later this week, which will help with the workflow for contributors.
>
> What we would like is to:
> - Ask the LEDE members currently maintaining targets to update their
> targets,
> - Ask the LEDE members to tell us about terms and wishes for reunite.
> Currently there is no official word from LEDE on this, which is quite
> confusing.
>
> We will start merging the pending patches in patchwork this week to get
> trunk back into a healthy state while discussions are underway. LEDE
> patches will also be brought in where appropriate.
>
> Regards,
> The OpenWrt team
>
> _______________________________________________
> openwrt-devel mailing list
> openwrt-devel at lists.openwrt.org
> https://lists.openwrt.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
>



-- 
Eric Schultz, Community Manager, prpl Foundation
http://www.prplfoundation.org
eschultz at prplfoundation.org
cell: 920-539-0404
skype: ericschultzwi
@EricPrpl
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/openwrt-devel/attachments/20160607/2c112d38/attachment.htm>
-------------- next part --------------
_______________________________________________
openwrt-devel mailing list
openwrt-devel at lists.openwrt.org
https://lists.openwrt.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel