[OpenWrt-Devel] On support status of OpenWrt for Qihoo C301

swigger swigger at gmail.com
Wed Sep 24 00:10:28 EDT 2014


I think they are in parallel connection, you can have a look at the circuit.

On Wed, Sep 24, 2014 at 10:57 AM, Yousong Zhou <yszhou4tech at gmail.com> wrote:
> On 23 September 2014 23:54, Weijie Gao <hackpascal at gmail.com> wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> The gap is not used in official firmware, so it is okay not to keep the gap.
>>
>
> Yeah, I checked the content of that segment when using OEM firmware
> with "md 0x9ff70000" and found it was almost all filled with 0xff.
>
>> The seama header of factory firmware contains the whole firmware. So after openwrt created the rootfs_data partition, the MD5 digest is corrupted. Instead, the seama header of sysupgrade firmware only contains the kernel, the MD5 digest will not be corrupted.
>>
>
> Wow, I see.  0xdeadc0de will be erased in the first boot.  Shame on me
> not thinking further on that.  This should be fixed.
>
>> The three ethernet LEDs are directly configured in mach-qihoo-c301.c, so it is not necessary to defined as GPIO LEDs.
>>
>> BTW, there are two status LEDs in the front, one is green and another one is red.
>
> Well, is it possible that they are actually 4 leds that can be
> controlled by 4 separate GPIOs?  2 groups of leds each controlled by 1
> GPIO just to increase the brightness so that it can seen from outside
> the case?
>
>>
>> Weijie Gao.
>>
>
>                yousong
> _______________________________________________
> openwrt-devel mailing list
> openwrt-devel at lists.openwrt.org
> https://lists.openwrt.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
_______________________________________________
openwrt-devel mailing list
openwrt-devel at lists.openwrt.org
https://lists.openwrt.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel



More information about the openwrt-devel mailing list