[vote] Update OpenWrt rules

[David Woodhouse]

On Tue, 2025-11-04 at 15:29 +0000, Daniel Golle wrote:
> 
> Of course, the only purpose of this 2nd-year-highschool-grade excercise
> was to show that this is not the same as counting it as 0.5 for YES and
> 0.5 for NO.

Yes. It shouldn't be a "half-approval" it should be a "two-thirds approval" :)

That part *should* be fixed in a subsequent vote.

But more importantly, we just shouldn't describe it in those terms at
all; we should describe as *discounting* those votes and requiring a
certain ratio of the non-neutral votes. And then the whole issue goes
away, as well as the emotive language of "half-approval" which has
caused so much consternation among people who I *believe* don't
actually object to the actual outcome.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/pkcs7-signature
Size: 5069 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.openwrt.org/pipermail/openwrt-adm/attachments/20251104/bf4a0cad/attachment.p7s>