[vote] Update OpenWrt rules

[David Lang]

David Woodhouse wrote:

> On Tue, 2025-10-28 at 15:50 +0000, Imre Kaloz wrote:
>> On Tue, 2025-10-28 at 15:53 +0000, David Woodhouse wrote:
>>
>> <snip>
>>
>>> Well, for a start *whatever* the 'neutral vote' is defined to be by the
>>> rules, that really ought to be the intent of the voter who, under those
>>> rules, decides to cast precisely that 'neutral vote'. That's kind of
>>> tautological.

how about you keep the 'must have X% of active people cast their vote, but 
calculate the 'did it win or not' do the calculation on the percentage of people 
who cast a non-abstain vote.

so if the quarum if 10 votes, but you have 2 for, 1 against and 7 abstain, that 
is a 2/3 majority for

seems a lot more simple than abstain counts as 1/2 or 2/3

David Lang
-------------- next part --------------
_______________________________________________
openwrt-adm mailing list
openwrt-adm at lists.openwrt.org
https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-adm