Revising OpenWrt Rules

Vincenzo Romano vincenzo.romano at notorand.it
Fri Sep 25 08:08:45 EDT 2020


I second this proposal.

--
Vincenzo Romano - NotOrAnd.IT
Information Technologies

--
NON QVIETIS MARIBVS NAVTA PERITVS
ΟΥΚ ΕΠΙ ΑΚΥΜΟΝΑΙΣ ΘΑΛΑΣΣΑΙΣ ΠΛΟΤΙΚΟΣ ΝΑYΤΗΣ ΓΙΓΝΕΤΑΙ

On Fri, Sep 25, 2020 at 1:54 PM Sam Kuper <sampablokuper at posteo.net> wrote:
>
> I'm just a sometime OpenWRT user, so weigh this accordingly...
>
>
> On Tue, Sep 15, 2020 at 08:01:36PM -0400, Rich Brown wrote:
> > Assorted stuff that I don't think is controversial...
> >
> > - All decisions need to be made public
>
> Can I propose something stronger:
>
>     All decisions need to be made *in* public.
>
> I.e. in a format that ensures anyone (with reasonable Internet access)
> can see or hear both:
>
> - How the decision *is* being made (at the time it is being made).  E.g.
>   via a publicly-readable mailing list or publicly-listenable/watchable
>   conference call.[1]
>
> - How the decision *was* made (after the fact).  E.g. through
>   publicly-accessible archives of project mailing lists or conference
>   calls.
>
>
>
> This would mean that if some OpenWRT decisionmakers were to discuss an
> upcoming decision in a private setting (over coffee at a conference, or
> in a private email conversation, or whatever), then they would not be
> able to ratify the decision in that discussion.  They would need to
> subsequently propose the decision in the relevant public forum (e.g. a
> publicly-accessible OpenWRT mailing list) for scrutiny and ratification.
>
>
> AFAICT, this is roughly how Debian works.  See e.g. point 5 of
> https://www.debian.org/code_of_conduct and also section 4.2(5) of
> https://www.debian.org/devel/constitution .  The latter says:
>
>     Proposals, sponsors, amendments, calls for votes and other formal
>     actions are made by announcement on a publicly-readable electronic
>     mailing list designated by the Project Leader's Delegate(s); any
>     Developer may post there.
>
>
> Best regards,
>
> Sam
>
>
> [1] Conference call audio is not accesible to deaf people, so a
> transcript would need to be made (ideally in real-time) lest OpenWRT be
> discriminatory.  Mailing lists avoid this trouble.
>
>
> --
> A: When it messes up the order in which people normally read text.
> Q: When is top-posting a bad thing?
>
> ()  ASCII ribbon campaign. Please avoid HTML emails & proprietary
> /\  file formats. (Why? See e.g. https://v.gd/jrmGbS ). Thank you.
>
> _______________________________________________
> openwrt-adm mailing list
> openwrt-adm at lists.openwrt.org
> https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-adm



More information about the openwrt-adm mailing list