[Was: Re: Firmware Selector Setup]

Paul Spooren mail at aparcar.org
Mon Sep 14 15:48:48 EDT 2020


On Mon Sep 14, 2020 at 9:35 AM HST, Baptiste Jonglez wrote:
> On 14-09-20, Paul Spooren wrote:
> > > - is it possible to add 18.06?
> > 
> > From my understanding, no. JSON support was only added to 19.07. We
> > could manually backport the patches oot and build once all targets just
> > to receive the profile.json files. Then we would have to update all
> > containing checksum inside the profiles, as many images are not yet
> > reproducible. Maybe a bit to much work?
>
> Ah, right, this JSON thing is not in 18.06.
>
> Is this JSON support difficult to backport? If not, it could be included
> in the next 18.06 release, so that the buildbots would generate the
> needed
> JSON files.

You can try your luck applying the following two PRs:
https://github.com/openwrt/openwrt/pull/3055
https://github.com/openwrt/openwrt/pull/3204

>
> > > Regarding 18.06, here is a use-case: I would like to search for a model,
> > > and then it would give me the latest stable version for it (18.06 or
> > > 19.07). A bit like https://openwrt.org/toh/start
> > >
> > > Currently, when I search "WR841", it only gives me TL-WR841N v13 because
> > > the earlier models are no longer built for 19.07. It would be nice to
> > > show the other models; that is, propose 18.06 as a fallback when 19.07
> > > is
> > > not supported.
> > >
> > > If this is not straightforward to implement, this could be added to a
> > > later version of YAFS: the current version is already good!
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > > Baptiste
> > >
> > > On 14-09-20, Moritz Warning wrote:
> > > > Hi Petr and everybody else,
> > > > 
> > > > thank you very much in making this possible!
> > > > I think this will be a significant step forwards in end user usability.
> > > > 
> > > > On 9/14/20 12:36 PM, Petr Štetiar wrote:
> > > > > Moritz Warning <moritzwarning at web.de> [2020-08-01 02:13:05]:
> > > > >
> > > > > Hi,
> > > > >
> > > > >> we have reached the point that we can finally set up the firmware selector [0]. Yay!
> > > > >> But somebody need to finally put it on the website...
> > > > >
> > > > > so https://firmware-selector.staging.openwrt.org is alive, deployed
> > > > > automatically from CI pipeline[1]. Any push into master branch deploys site at
> > > > > firmware-selector.staging.o.o (once all CI tests pass). Then after additional
> > > > > QA steps done usually by humans it's possible to manually trigger another CI
> > > > > pipeline which is going to deploy the site at production URL
> > > > > firmware-selector.openwrt.org.
> > > > >
> > > > > Next steps:
> > > > >
> > > > >  - fix the `web` group/repo name clash on GitLab.com/openwrt and setup mirroring and
> > > > >    CI/CD deployment from GitLab.com/openwrt/web/firmware-selector-openwrt-org.git
> > > > >  - fix remaining issues (if any) on staging and make the site officialy alive
> > > > >    on firmware-selector.openwrt.org
> > > > >
> > > > > I plan to tackle these in the upcoming days.
> > > > >
> > > > > 1. https://gitlab.com/ynezz/openwrt-firmware-selector/-/pipelines/189588455
> > > > Let me know if I can help.
> > > > 
> > > > >
> > > > > Cheers,
> > > > >
> > > > > Petr
> > > > >
> > > > 
> > > > 
> > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > openwrt-adm mailing list
> > > > openwrt-adm at lists.openwrt.org
> > > > https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-adm
> > 




More information about the openwrt-adm mailing list