backports kick?

[Janusz Dziedzic]

pon., 24 cze 2024 o 19:45 Janusz Dziedzic <janusz.dziedzic at gmail.com>
napisał(a):
>
> pon., 24 cze 2024 o 14:38 Felix Fietkau <nbd at nbd.name> napisał(a):
> >
> > On 24.06.24 13:46, Janusz Dziedzic wrote:
> > > pt., 21 cze 2024 o 12:59 Felix Fietkau <nbd at nbd.name> napisał(a):
> > >>
> > >> On 21.06.24 10:55, Janusz Dziedzic wrote:
> > >> > Hello,
> > >> > I see we have backports older than kernel on main (6.6.15 vs 6.6.32)?
> > >> > Is there plan to kick backports to smth like 6.10?
> > >>
> > >> I have 6.9.1 in my staging tree for testing.
> > >>
> > >
> > > Nice, are also patches (reworked) available?
> >
> > My modified backports tree is here:
> > https://github.com/nbd168/backports
> >
> Thanks, this is what I needed.
> Hope will be soon in main :)
>
Any chance for 6.10.x in main?
Or we will use 6.9.1?

Asking because of BE200,
6.9.1 don't support FW90 (with MLO support) - while 6.10 support it
correctly (FW90 and MLO/MLD).

So, any chance for that soon?
BTW, do we have somewhere openwrt backports copy-list or git/data we
are used during backport generation?
And regarding backports - did someone patch it to use python3?
After some fight generate correctly my backports - but is there some
wiki description how we should do it correctly for openwrt?
Would be useful :)

BR
Janusz