here we are again: real name 'discussion'

[John Crispin]

I do not see anyone from the committers complaining about the revert. If 
folks felt that a vote was neccesseary, then someone would have started one.

I have a feeling that folks are happy with the old status quo and no 
vote is required.

     John

On 18.04.24 16:13, Paul D wrote:
> On 2024-04-16 16:41, Etienne Champetier wrote:
>> Le mar. 16 avr. 2024 à 10:34, Paul D <newtwen at gmail.com> a écrit :
>>> On 2024-03-27 23:56, Etienne Champetier wrote:
>>>> As this is a legal issue, should we get SFC opinion first ?
>>>>
>>>> Etienne
>>>>
>>> Is this happening?
>> Sorry I missed your last ping
>> This was an open question, I don't know who to contact at SFC
>>
>> Looking at old emails, John, Jo and Hauke are our liaison with SFC
> So, John, Jo and Hauke,
>
> who is the current liaison to SFC?
>
> what does the SFC think?
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> openwrt-devel mailing list
> openwrt-devel at lists.openwrt.org
> https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel