[PATCH v2 6/7] coreutils: Import from packages feed
hacks at slashdirt.org
Sat Jan 7 15:02:06 PST 2023
> Le 7 janv. 2023 à 22:41, Robert Marko <robimarko at gmail.com> a écrit :
> On Sat, 7 Jan 2023 at 16:26, Thibaut VARÈNE <varenet at zigoo.net> wrote:
>>> Le 7 janv. 2023 à 15:06, Christian Marangi <ansuelsmth at gmail.com> a écrit :
>>> On Fri, Jan 06, 2023 at 11:49:44PM -0800, Brian Norris wrote:
>>>> I need to express a per-target dependency on the 'base64' utility, and
>>>> that's seemingly impossible to do for busybox. Pull in coreutils to make
>>>> that easier.
>>>> Signed-off-by: Brian Norris <computersforpeace at gmail.com>
>>> We still need to think of a correct solution for this... coreutils is an
>>> option but wonder if a better one is openssl... Actually we have a small
>>> tool to handle specific decryption of some stuff... Wonder if that can
>>> be expanded for this task and just use wolfssl or openssl api to decode
>>> base64 stuff?
>> Using one or the other would impose (i.e. (en)force) that SSL library on this particular target. Do we want this, especially considering the ongoing conversation about mbedTLS?
>> Also pulling an entire SSL implementation just to decode base64 seems a tad overkill too.
> I agree on this one, forcing usage of OpenSSL isn't ideal, coreutils
> is a better option for sure.
There might be an even easier/lighter way (short of enabling base64 in busybox), AWK to the rescue:
The code is clean and judging by the comment line 97, works with busybox awk.
More information about the openwrt-devel