[PATCH 7/8] ath10k-ct: Support qcom,ath10k-calibration-data-base64

Stefan Lippers-Hollmann s.l-h at gmx.de
Thu Jan 5 19:12:04 PST 2023


On 2023-01-06, Christian Marangi wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 05, 2023 at 02:03:24PM -0800, Brian Norris wrote:
> > On Thu, Jan 5, 2023 at 11:59 AM Brian Norris
> > Do I need to create some intermediate/stub package just to express the
> > dependency, or is there some better way?
> >
> In theory there is [1] coreutils-base64 as a separate package but I
> think we have to move that to core packages as it's part of the feeds
> package.

There would be another alternative for base64 functionality, openssl...
While not the lightest package, it's already available in main and
with DEVICE_PACKAGES a relatively low-maintenance alternative.

openssl enc -base64 -in foo -out foo.base64
openssl enc -d -base64 -in foo.base64 -out foo

With root/ overlay on eMMC, this shouldn't be too heavy for this
kind of hardware.

Disclaimer: I did not check wolfssl/ mbedtls for potential

	Stefan Lippers-Hollmann

More information about the openwrt-devel mailing list