[PATCH 5/8] ipq8064: ASoC: qcom: lpass-cpu: Fix fallback SD line index handling

[Robert Marko]

On Thu, 5 Jan 2023 at 04:02, Brian Norris <computersforpeace at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Hi Christian, Robert,
>
> On Wed, Jan 04, 2023 at 02:30:23PM +0100, Robert Marko wrote:
> > On Wed, 4 Jan 2023 at 14:04, Christian Marangi <ansuelsmth at gmail.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > On Mon, Jan 02, 2023 at 03:25:31PM -0800, Brian Norris wrote:
> > > > This fixes device tree registration for 'qcom,lpass-cpu' as used by
> > > > qcom-ipq8064 SoCs, and allows speaker audio to function.
> > > >
> > > > This patch has been submitted (and merged, for -next) upstream.
> > >
> > > Considering it's tagged for stable and assuming it will be part of 6.2
> > > wonder if it's a good idea to add the kernel tag to better track this?
>
> I first wrote this when I had just posted the patch; didn't expect it to
> land so quickly!
>
> But what do you mean: just tweak the commit title to 'kernel: ...'? Or
> move this to the generic kernel patches
> (target/linux/generic/backport-5.15/)?

No need for generic as its cleary QCA related, he means to add the
kernel version
it will be available in after number, so lets say 024-v6.2-whatever.patch
>
> > Also, the 900 prefix isn't really meant for backports.
>
> Ack. I only just noticed target/linux/generic/PATCHES. So I guess that's
> one of these?
>
>   0xx - upstream backports
>   1xx - code awaiting upstream merge
>
> Thanks,
> Brian