pt., 9 wrz 2022 o 12:30 Andrey Jr. Melnikov <temnota.am at gmail.com> napisał(a):
>
> Janusz Dziedzic <janusz.dziedzic at gmail.com> wrote:
> > [-- text/plain, encoding quoted-printable, charset: UTF-8, 86 lines --]
>
> > pt., 9 wrz 2022 o 04:32 LiXiong Liu <lxliu at ikuai8.com> napisał(a):
> > >
> > > ### swconfig & DSA VLAN Configuration Comparison
>
> [....]
>
> > > #bridge vlan show
> > > port vlan-id
> > > lan1 100 PVID Egress Untagged
> > > lan2 100 PVID Egress Untagged
> > > lan3 1 PVID Egress Untagged
> > > lan4 1 PVID Egress Untagged
> > > lan5 1 PVID Egress Untagged
> > > 10
> > > br-lan 1 PVID Egress Untagged
> > > 10
> > >
>
> > We are using smth like this:
>
> > config bridge-vlan 'vlan1'
> > option name 'vlan1'
> > option device 'br-lan'
> > option vlan '1'
> > option flags 'untagged pvid'
> "untagged pvid" is tautology. PVID stands for "Port VLAN ID" - is a default VLAN ID that is assigned to an access
> port. Access ports only for untagged (stripped tag) frames. So, drop 'untagged'
> from options or 'pvid'.
>
What in case I would like to have smth like:
br-lan 1 PVID Egress Untagged
10 Egress Untagged
bridge vlan <> - tool allow this configuration. Why we should add any
limitation in UCI?
BR
Janusz
> > option local '1'
> > list ports 'eth2:*'
> > list ports 'eth3:*'
>
> [...]
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> openwrt-devel mailing list
> openwrt-devel at lists.openwrt.org
> https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
--
Janusz Dziedzic