Moving ipq-wifi to a dedicated repo
Christian Lamparter
chunkeey at gmail.com
Wed Jun 29 14:08:43 PDT 2022
On 28/06/2022 23:41, Ansuel Smith wrote:
> As the title said, it was suggested to move the ipq-wifi package
> board file to a separate repo.
ipq-wifi Makefile is painfully self aware in that regard.
| 20 # This is intended to be used on an interim basis until device-specific
| 21 # board data for new devices is available through the upstream compilation
| 22 #
| 23 # Please send a mail with your device-specific board files upstream.
| 24 # You can find instructions and examples on the linux-wireless wiki:
| 25 # <https://wireless.wiki.kernel.org/en/users/drivers/ath10k/boardfiles>
My "go-to" solution was to point people to this notice, provided them with
the example/template and wait for a mail to show up on ath10k-devel before
merging the "new device" PRs. If OpenWrt starts a repo for boardfiles, that
maintainer would be left holding the bag for upstreaming the files themselves.
So in a way, that separate repo exists in Kalle's
https://github.com/kvalo/ath10k-firmware and the upstream linux-firmware.git
As for moving the eye-sores to a separate repository: If the (group) of
people which suggested the move wants to do it for the duration:
Sure, why not?
If they welcome ideas and random thoughts:
Kalle extended the public/open-source ath10k-bdencoder tool with an
"--add-mbox" (parses mbox/mails) and "--commit" (commit it to a git repo)
options. Maybe this could be of some use?
Yes, this would essentially create one big board-2.bin for each QCAXXXX
variant. But this might not be that bad, because the file can simply be
shipped for all non-upstreamed devices instead of the individual
ipq-wifi-$device packages we have now.
Regards,
Christian
More information about the openwrt-devel
mailing list