[PATCH v4 1/6] at91: kernel: bump to 5.10

[Claudiu.Beznea at microchip.com]

On 04.10.2021 01:47, Hauke Mehrtens wrote:
> EXTERNAL EMAIL: Do not click links or open attachments unless you know the
> content is safe
> 
> On 9/20/21 11:27 AM, Claudiu Beznea wrote:
>> Bump at91 targets to kernel v5.10. With this patches and files for
>> wb45n and wb50n were removed as they are now included in upstream
>> kernel. Along with:
>> - this the kernel config for sam9x targets has been refreshed (with
>>    make kernel_menuconfig + save);
>> - CONFIG_ARCH_AT91 and specific sam9x SoCs (AT91RM9200, AT91SAM9,
>>    SAM9X60) has been enabled such that sam9x SoCs to be able to boot.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Claudiu Beznea <claudiu.beznea at microchip.com>
>> ---
>>   target/linux/at91/Makefile                    |   2 +-
>>   .../at91/files/arch/arm/boot/dts/wb45n.dts    | 220 ------------------
>>   .../at91/files/arch/arm/boot/dts/wb50n.dts    | 113 ---------
>>   .../at91/files/arch/arm/boot/dts/wb50n.dtsi   | 205 ----------------
>>   target/linux/at91/image/sam9x.mk              |   1 +
>>   target/linux/at91/image/sama5.mk              |   1 +
>>   .../101-ARM-at91-build-dtb-for-q5xr5.patch    |  10 +
>>   .../101-ARM-at91-build-dtb-for-q5xr5.patch    |  10 -
>>   .../102-ARM-at91-build-dtb-for-wb45n.patch    |  12 -
>>   ...2-ARM-at91-wb45n-fix-duplicate-label.patch |  20 --
>>   .../103-ARM-at91-build-dtb-for-wb50n.patch    |  12 -
>>   ...3-ARM-at91-wb50n-fix-duplicate-label.patch |  39 ----
>>   target/linux/at91/sam9x/config-default        | 105 ++++-----
> 
> The target/linux/at91/sama5/config-default probably also needs some
> updates. When I compile the sama5 subtaregt the kernel find the folowing
> new symbols:
> 
> Enable firmware caching during suspend (FW_CACHE) [Y/n/?] (NEW)
> ATMEL Image Sensor Controller (ISC) support (VIDEO_ATMEL_ISC) [N/m/y/?]
> (NEW)
> Microchip ASoC driver for boards using S/PDIF TX (SND_MCHP_SOC_SPDIFTX)
> [N/m/y/?] (NEW)
> Microchip ASoC driver for boards using S/PDIF RX (SND_MCHP_SOC_SPDIFRX)
> [N/m/y/?] (NEW)
> Special Function Registers support (AT91_SOC_SFR) [N/m/y/?] (NEW)

That's true. I'll fix it in the next version.

> 
> Hauke