[RFC v2 3/3] ath79: add support for Mikrotik RouterBoard 912G

Adrian Schmutzler mail at adrianschmutzler.de
Sun May 30 15:24:38 PDT 2021


Hi,

> -----Original Message-----
> From: openwrt-devel [mailto:openwrt-devel-bounces at lists.openwrt.org]
> On Behalf Of Koen Vandeputte
> Sent: Donnerstag, 27. Mai 2021 13:52
> To: Adrian Schmutzler <mail at adrianschmutzler.de>; 'Denis Kalashnikov'
> <denis281089 at gmail.com>; openwrt-devel at lists.openwrt.org
> Cc: 'Gabor Juhos' <juhosg at openwrt.org>; 'Sergey Ryazanov'
> <ryazanov.s.a at gmail.com>
> Subject: Re: [RFC v2 3/3] ath79: add support for Mikrotik RouterBoard 912G
> 
> 
> On 23.05.21 11:01, Adrian Schmutzler wrote:
> > ...
> >> diff --git a/target/linux/ath79/image/mikrotik.mk
> >> b/target/linux/ath79/image/mikrotik.mk
> >> index 74f8603b5a..0072ec527d 100644
> >> --- a/target/linux/ath79/image/mikrotik.mk
> >> +++ b/target/linux/ath79/image/mikrotik.mk
> >> @@ -9,6 +9,15 @@ define Device/mikrotik_routerboard-493g  endef
> >> TARGET_DEVICES += mikrotik_routerboard-493g
> >>
> >> +define Device/mikrotik_routerboard-912g
> >> +  $(Device/mikrotik_nand)
> >> +  SOC := ar9342
> >> +  DEVICE_MODEL := RouterBOARD 912G
> >> +  DEVICE_PACKAGES += kmod-usb-ehci kmod-usb2 kmod-gpio-beeper
> >> +  SUPPORTED_DEVICES += rb-912uag-5hpnd rb-912uag-2hpnd endef
> > So, both have exactly the same setup as implemented here?
> >
> > Best
> >
> > Adrian
> >
> yes.
> 
> I personally use rb-912uag-5hpnd board.
> The hardware is identical with the exception of the band used.
> 
> What's your 2 cents to get both supported using a single target?

I do not have any problems with the presented solution, this was just a question.

The naming and organization of the Mikrotik devices in OpenWrt has been an open discussion for quite some time now, and I have given up any hope of finding a solution that will be satisfying all competing requirements. (The only thing that I try to keep consistent for now is having "routerboard-" instead of "rb-" for the "new" names.)

So, no objections for the choice made here.

Best

Adrian

> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Koen
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> openwrt-devel mailing list
> openwrt-devel at lists.openwrt.org
> https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: openpgp-digital-signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 834 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.openwrt.org/pipermail/openwrt-devel/attachments/20210531/d65835c3/attachment.sig>


More information about the openwrt-devel mailing list