[RFC PATCH v2 0/1] Introduce UCI support for configuring DSA VLAN filter rules

Felix Fietkau nbd at nbd.name
Fri Mar 26 09:44:38 GMT 2021


On 2021-03-26 09:55, Martin Schiller wrote:
> On 2021-03-26 09:42, Felix Fietkau wrote:
>> On 2021-03-26 09:34, Martin Schiller wrote:
>>> On 2020-07-24 19:13, Felix Fietkau wrote:
>>>> On 2020-07-24 18:44, Jo-Philipp Wich wrote:
>>>>> Hi Felix,
>>>>> 
>>>>>> [...]
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> For a simple default config, you could have this:
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> # network
>>>>>> config device
>>>>>         option type bridge  # I assume this is needed as well
>>>>>> 	option name switch0
>>>> Correct.
>>>> 
>>>>>> config bridge-vlan
>>>>>> 	option vlan 1
>>>>>> 	option ports "lan1 lan2 lan3 lan4"
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> config interface lan
>>>>>> 	option ifname switch0.1
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> # wireless
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> config wifi-iface
>>>>>> 	option network lan
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> In this case, wlan0 would be added to switch0 and set to VLAN 1
>>>>>> untagged
>>>>>> by default.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> If you want it on VLAN 10 tagged/PVID instead, you could do:
>>>>>> 	option network-vlan "10:t*"
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> What do you think?
>>>>> 
>>>>> I did think about it some more, also in context of a LuCI
>>>>> implementation and
>>>>> the special role of wifi and I am convinced now that this approach
>>>>> generally
>>>>> makes sense.
>>>>> 
>>>>> However for the vlan I wonder if we should simply use "option vid 
>>>>> 10"
>>>>> since
>>>>> setting anything besides an egress untagged pvid does not make sense
>>>>> for wifi.
>>>> I think more complex VLAN settings make sense for WDS if you want to
>>>> carry multiple networks over the link.
>>>> 
>>>>> So your second example above would become:
>>>>> 
>>>>>   config wifi-iface
>>>>>     option network lan
>>>>>     option vid 10  # instead of inheriting vid 1, use 10 as pvid
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> Also, just to clarify... assuming a:
>>>>> 
>>>>>   config interface foo
>>>>>     option ifname somevlanbridge0.456
>>>>> 
>>>>> and an wifi iface without an explicit vid override:
>>>>> 
>>>>>   config wifi-iface
>>>>>     option network foo
>>>>> 
>>>>> ... we would inherit vid 456 and set as pvid, right? Or are we are
>>>>> always
>>>>> going to default to 1?
>>>> It would inherit 456 to keep it in sync with the VLAN based network.
>>>> 
>>> 
>>> Is this functionality already integrated?
>>> I am testing with a xrx200 based system with the DSA mainline driver 
>>> and
>>> a wifi interface and have the problem that the wlan0 interface is 
>>> added
>>> to the bridge switch0 but the bridge vlan configuration for the wlan0
>>> interface is not set.
>> It's handled differently now.
>> 
>> You can set lan's ifname to switch0.1 (without option type bridge) and
>> use 'option network lan' in the wifi-iface. It will detect that the lan
>> ifname is a vlan on top of a vlan-filtering bridge and will add wlan0 
>> to
>> switch0 and make it a member of lan's vlan.
>> 
> 
> Hmmm... I think that's what I've alread done. Here is my config:
> 
> network:
> ---------
> config interface 'lan'
> 	option proto 'static'
> 	option ipaddr '192.168.X.Y'
> 	option netmask '255.255.255.0'
> 	option ifname 'switch0.1'
> 
> config device
> 	option type 'bridge'
> 	option name 'switch0'
> 	list ifname 'lan1'
> 	list ifname 'lan2'
> 	list ifname 'lan3'
> 	list ifname 'lan4'
> 
> config bridge-vlan
> 	option device 'switch0'
> 	option vlan '1'
> 	list ports 'lan1:u*'
> 	list ports 'lan2:u*'
> 	list ports 'lan3:u*'
> 	list ports 'lan4:u*'
> 
> wireless:
> ----------
> config wifi-iface 'default_radio0'
> 	option device 'radio0'
> 	option mode 'ap'
> 	option encryption 'psk2'
> 	option ssid 'TETS-AP'
> 	option network 'lan'
> 	option key 'xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx'
> 	option wpa_disable_eapol_key_retries '1'
> 
> 
> Did I forget anything?
Looks right to me. I'll see if I can find the time to reproduce this.
You're using a recent version of OpenWrt, right?

- Felix



More information about the openwrt-devel mailing list