isprotejesvalkata at gmail.com
Wed Apr 21 18:38:56 BST 2021
On 4/19/21 11:26 PM, Hauke Mehrtens wrote:
> On 4/19/21 8:59 AM, Andre Heider wrote:
>> On 19/04/2021 08:51, Florian Eckert wrote:
>>>> If there are some other bugs in the 21.02 branch which are fixed in
>>>> master, we can backport the fixed as long as they are not so big. If
>>>> there is something missing, just ask on the mainling list.
>>> Since last weekend the following patch was merged into master.
>>> The patch extends ltq-vdsl ubus interface with the missing state_num
>>> and power_state_num values.
>>> Could we please backport this to the branch openwrt-21.02 before rc1
>>> stable release?
>> Let's get these two patches in too:
>> 48162e4c0c85a7f64d9007565bf5be2c7ace3ada lantiq: enable G.INP
>> retransmission counters
>> 4f27ea7c33447f4b0c8e577509726927916b9625 lantiq: use ActualNetDataRate
>> for speed reporting
>> With those 3 patches 21.02 matches master with the big ubus dsl metric
> I added these 3 patches, but only after tagging.
> We should do a 21.02.0-rc2 in 2 to 3 weeks anyway.
> openwrt-devel mailing list
> openwrt-devel at lists.openwrt.org
Now that openwrt-21.02-rc1 is tagged, would it be possible to have an
"openwrt-21.02" section for the Reported Version on bugs.openwrt.org?
While at it, why is it still possible to file bug reports for lede-17.01?
More information about the openwrt-devel