[OpenWrt-Devel] core package definition, 2nd attempt [Was: Re: [PATCH] iproute2: ... ]

Petr Štetiar ynezz at true.cz
Mon Mar 16 08:01:51 EDT 2020

Hans Dedecker <dedeckeh at gmail.com> [2020-03-16 08:37:49]:


> > > On Thu, Mar 5, 2020 at 8:34 PM Mathias Kresin <dev at kresin.me> wrote:
> >
> > Try to get libcap into the OpenWrt base system and enable HAVE_CAP
> > afterwards?
> I'm in favor of this approach as currently a part of the ip-full
> functionality is broken and I see ip-full for now and in the future as
> a core package.

Why do you think so? Can you try to define what is "core package" from your
point of view? Why should this iproute2 package be in the main tree, why it
doesn't belong into package feeds?

Stijn Tintel <stijn at linux-ipv6.be> [2020-03-16 13:50:20]:

> +1 for moving libcap to core. Other packages could benefit from it too
> (lldpd comes to mind).

IMHO lldpd should be probably moved to package feeds as well

1. http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/openwrt-devel/2019-August/018399.html

-- ynezz

openwrt-devel mailing list
openwrt-devel at lists.openwrt.org

More information about the openwrt-devel mailing list