Thu Jun 25 05:52:11 EDT 2020
renaming the leds. but I'm sure you have a better general view than I.
I'm fine to skip this patch of the series and fix the DSL led of the
affected boards after renaming the leds.
I totally agree with you, that the led naming is suboptimal. I'm
currently working on adding support for systems which are using three
leds for boot state indication. I had to rewrite the whole diag.sh,
with the benefit that we can get rid of the static power[0-2] naming
as well. With having led names like power[0-2] without any indication
which colour the led has, it's a mess to ensure that I don't break
existing power led setups.
Am I right that you are talking about a naming scheme like
"devicename:colour:function" as it's suggested by
Are there any known limitations for the led node names, which are
available at /sys/class/leds/*/device/of_node/? Maybe we can use node
names according to the intended (OpenWrt) use and prevent bloating the
board.d led file this way after switching to the
Are you working on renaming the leds or are you wait for patches?
openwrt-devel mailing list
openwrt-devel at lists.openwrt.org
More information about the openwrt-devel