[PATCH] hostapd: improve TITLE for packages

[mail at adrianschmutzler.de]

Hi,

> >  define Package/wpa-supplicant-openssl  $(call
> > Package/wpa-supplicant/Default,$(1))
> > +  TITLE+= (OpenSSL)
> 
> shouldn't this rather be '(OpenSSL full)' as well then?
> 
> >    VARIANT:=supplicant-full-openssl
> >    DEPENDS+=+libopenssl
> >  endef
> >
> >  define Package/wpa-supplicant-wolfssl  $(call
> > Package/wpa-supplicant/Default,$(1))
> > +  TITLE+= (wolfSSL)
> 
> shouldn't this rather be '(wolfSSL full)' as well then?

Indeed, good find, will change both cases above as suggested.

> And what about the '(built-in full)' variant of wpa_supplicant?

Err, yes, to follow the current scheme I should add a "(full)" there as well.

Would you prefer to use "(built-in full)" instead of plain "(full)" in all non-SSL cases?
This might actually be more helpful to differentiate.

Thanks

Adrian 
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: openpgp-digital-signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 834 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.openwrt.org/pipermail/openwrt-devel/attachments/20200730/182af165/attachment.sig>