Transform OpenWRT to a Yocto / openembedded layer
abuse at basmevissen.nl
Thu Jul 30 05:41:04 EDT 2020
On 2020-07-30 11:15, mail at adrianschmutzler.de wrote:
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Bas Mevissen [mailto:abuse at basmevissen.nl]
>> Sent: Donnerstag, 30. Juli 2020 10:54
>> To: Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni at bootlin.com>
>> Cc: mail at adrianschmutzler.de; openwrt-devel at lists.openwrt.org
>> Subject: Transform OpenWRT to a Yocto / openembedded layer (was: Re:
>> dm-verity support)
>> Isn't there some deferred or other state that better expresses the
> For me, "deferred" means essentially "we don't do it now, but we will
> do it later".
> However, there is no indication that the situation will be different
> in a year or two. So I chose "rejected", as a waiting time of 8 months
> without any response indicate that the feature is not wanted.
> As Thomas stated himself, this surely is "unfortunate", but I'm just
> putting into effect what's obvious here.
Yes, you probably did the best thing that can be done in this situation:
bring it to some kind of closure and inform the submitter of the reason.
With the latter being properly done, the actual working of the closure
is less relevant.
More information about the openwrt-devel