[PATCH 2/2] busybox: backport extra time patches
Rosen Penev
rosenp at gmail.com
Mon Jul 20 18:32:53 EDT 2020
They fix compilation with musl 1.2.0, which uses 64-bit time_t.
Signed-off-by: Rosen Penev <rosenp at gmail.com>
---
.../utils/busybox/patches/002-time64.patch | 46 ++++++++++++++++++
.../utils/busybox/patches/003-gettime.patch | 48 +++++++++++++++++++
2 files changed, 94 insertions(+)
create mode 100644 package/utils/busybox/patches/002-time64.patch
create mode 100644 package/utils/busybox/patches/003-gettime.patch
diff --git a/package/utils/busybox/patches/002-time64.patch b/package/utils/busybox/patches/002-time64.patch
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000..7f8c6bfe5d
--- /dev/null
+++ b/package/utils/busybox/patches/002-time64.patch
@@ -0,0 +1,46 @@
+From 902d3992922fc8db8495d5fb30a4581711b60c62 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
+From: Alistair Francis <alistair.francis at wdc.com>
+Date: Wed, 18 Sep 2019 09:28:50 -0700
+Subject: time: Use 64 prefix syscall if we have to
+
+Some 32-bit architectures no longer have the 32-bit time_t syscalls.
+Instead they have suffixed syscalls that returns a 64-bit time_t. If
+the architecture doesn't have the non-suffixed syscall and is using a
+64-bit time_t let's use the suffixed syscall instead.
+
+This fixes build issues when building for RISC-V 32-bit with 5.1+ kernel
+headers.
+
+If an architecture only supports the suffixed syscalls, but is still
+using a 32-bit time_t report a compilation error. This avoids us have to
+deal with converting between 64-bit and 32-bit values. There are
+currently no architectures where this is the case.
+
+Signed-off-by: Alistair Francis <alistair.francis at wdc.com>
+Signed-off-by: Denys Vlasenko <vda.linux at googlemail.com>
+---
+ libbb/time.c | 7 +++++++
+ 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+)
+
+(limited to 'libbb/time.c')
+
+diff --git a/libbb/time.c b/libbb/time.c
+index cab0ad602..b6fcae28b 100644
+--- a/libbb/time.c
++++ b/libbb/time.c
+@@ -257,7 +257,14 @@ char* FAST_FUNC strftime_YYYYMMDDHHMMSS(char *buf, unsigned len, time_t *tp)
+ * typically requiring -lrt. We just skip all this mess */
+ static void get_mono(struct timespec *ts)
+ {
++#if defined(__NR_clock_gettime)
+ if (syscall(__NR_clock_gettime, CLOCK_MONOTONIC, ts))
++#elif __TIMESIZE == 64
++ if (syscall(__NR_clock_gettime64, CLOCK_MONOTONIC, ts))
++#else
++# error "We currently don't support architectures without " \
++ "the __NR_clock_gettime syscall and 32-bit time_t"
++#endif
+ bb_error_msg_and_die("clock_gettime(MONOTONIC) failed");
+ }
+ unsigned long long FAST_FUNC monotonic_ns(void)
+
diff --git a/package/utils/busybox/patches/003-gettime.patch b/package/utils/busybox/patches/003-gettime.patch
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000..8ad4804179
--- /dev/null
+++ b/package/utils/busybox/patches/003-gettime.patch
@@ -0,0 +1,48 @@
+From be5a505d771a77c640acc35ceaa470c80e62f954 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
+From: Denys Vlasenko <vda.linux at googlemail.com>
+Date: Thu, 24 Oct 2019 16:26:55 +0200
+Subject: Remove syscall wrappers around clock_gettime, closes 12091
+
+12091 "Direct use of __NR_clock_gettime is not time64-safe".
+
+function old new delta
+runsv_main 1698 1712 +14
+startservice 378 383 +5
+get_mono 31 25 -6
+date_main 932 926 -6
+gettimeofday_ns 17 - -17
+------------------------------------------------------------------------------
+(add/remove: 0/1 grow/shrink: 2/2 up/down: 19/-29) Total: -10 bytes
+
+Signed-off-by: Denys Vlasenko <vda.linux at googlemail.com>
+---
+ libbb/time.c | 11 +----------
+ 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 10 deletions(-)
+
+(limited to 'libbb/time.c')
+
+diff --git a/libbb/time.c b/libbb/time.c
+index b6fcae28b..e66a9cba8 100644
+--- a/libbb/time.c
++++ b/libbb/time.c
+@@ -253,18 +253,9 @@ char* FAST_FUNC strftime_YYYYMMDDHHMMSS(char *buf, unsigned len, time_t *tp)
+ #define CLOCK_MONOTONIC 1
+ #endif
+
+-/* libc has incredibly messy way of doing this,
+- * typically requiring -lrt. We just skip all this mess */
+ static void get_mono(struct timespec *ts)
+ {
+-#if defined(__NR_clock_gettime)
+- if (syscall(__NR_clock_gettime, CLOCK_MONOTONIC, ts))
+-#elif __TIMESIZE == 64
+- if (syscall(__NR_clock_gettime64, CLOCK_MONOTONIC, ts))
+-#else
+-# error "We currently don't support architectures without " \
+- "the __NR_clock_gettime syscall and 32-bit time_t"
+-#endif
++ if (clock_gettime(CLOCK_MONOTONIC, ts))
+ bb_error_msg_and_die("clock_gettime(MONOTONIC) failed");
+ }
+ unsigned long long FAST_FUNC monotonic_ns(void)
+
--
2.26.2
More information about the openwrt-devel
mailing list