[OpenWrt-Devel] [PATCH v2 2/2] ramips: Add support for ZBT WE1026-H

mail at adrianschmutzler.de mail at adrianschmutzler.de
Thu Sep 26 08:52:37 EDT 2019


Hi Kristian,

I've just sent two patches on which you could rebase if you like.

Since I do not have the device, I cannot test, so they most probably won't be merged soon.

Best

Adrian

> -----Original Message-----
> From: openwrt-devel [mailto:openwrt-devel-bounces at lists.openwrt.org]
> On Behalf Of Kristian Evensen
> Sent: Donnerstag, 26. September 2019 11:36
> To: Adrian Schmutzler <mail at adrianschmutzler.de>
> Cc: Alex Maclean <monkeh at monkeh.net>; OpenWrt Development List
> <openwrt-devel at lists.openwrt.org>; Mathias Kresin <dev at kresin.me>;
> musashino.open at gmail.com; Petr Štetiar <ynezz at true.cz>
> Subject: Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] [PATCH v2 2/2] ramips: Add support for ZBT
> WE1026-H
> 
> Hi Adrian,
> 
> On Tue, Sep 24, 2019 at 6:22 PM <mail at adrianschmutzler.de> wrote:
> > I'm all about consistency. I just scanned the image definitions in ramips:
> >
> > ...
> >
> > The only device deviating from the pattern "zbtlink_zbt-something" is
> zbtlink_we1026-5g-16m.
> >
> > So, IMO the correct solution _in terms of consistency_ would be to rename
> zbtlink_we1026-5g-16m to zbtlink_zbt-we1026-5g-16m and then adjust your
> device support for the -H to that scheme.
> >
> > Do you agree? If yes, you could either implement all changes within or
> before your patch 1/2. Or I could send a patch for that and you rebase on it.
> >
> > What do you think?
> 
> I am fine with either approach. I will not have time to look at this device again
> before the weekend, so I will take whatever is in the tree then and rebase +
> apply fixes. If you patch has not been accepted/merged, I will change the
> naming of the 1026-devices.
> 
> BR,
> Kristian
> 
> _______________________________________________
> openwrt-devel mailing list
> openwrt-devel at lists.openwrt.org
> https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: openpgp-digital-signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 834 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/openwrt-devel/attachments/20190926/3ae44f09/attachment.sig>
-------------- next part --------------
_______________________________________________
openwrt-devel mailing list
openwrt-devel at lists.openwrt.org
https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel


More information about the openwrt-devel mailing list