[OpenWrt-Devel] [PATCH 3/3] mvebu: backport upstream fixes for armada 37xx

Tomasz Maciej Nowak tomek_n at o2.pl
Sun Jan 13 15:30:26 EST 2019


Upstream patches for processor frequency scaling, which fix possible
system hard lockups.

Signed-off-by: Tomasz Maciej Nowak <tomek_n at o2.pl>
---
 ...-37xx-periph-Fix-switching-CPU-rate-.patch | 92 +++++++++++++++++++
 ...-37xx-periph-Fix-wrong-return-value-.patch | 33 +++++++
 ...-37xx-periph-Remove-unused-var-num_p.patch | 33 +++++++
 3 files changed, 158 insertions(+)
 create mode 100644 target/linux/mvebu/patches-4.14/510-clk-mvebu-armada-37xx-periph-Fix-switching-CPU-rate-.patch
 create mode 100644 target/linux/mvebu/patches-4.14/511-clk-mvebu-armada-37xx-periph-Fix-wrong-return-value-.patch
 create mode 100644 target/linux/mvebu/patches-4.14/512-clk-mvebu-armada-37xx-periph-Remove-unused-var-num_p.patch

diff --git a/target/linux/mvebu/patches-4.14/510-clk-mvebu-armada-37xx-periph-Fix-switching-CPU-rate-.patch b/target/linux/mvebu/patches-4.14/510-clk-mvebu-armada-37xx-periph-Fix-switching-CPU-rate-.patch
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000..42bfef7b7e
--- /dev/null
+++ b/target/linux/mvebu/patches-4.14/510-clk-mvebu-armada-37xx-periph-Fix-switching-CPU-rate-.patch
@@ -0,0 +1,92 @@
+From 61c40f35f5cd6f67ccbd7319a1722eb78c815989 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
+From: Gregory CLEMENT <gregory.clement at bootlin.com>
+Date: Tue, 19 Jun 2018 14:34:45 +0200
+Subject: [PATCH] clk: mvebu: armada-37xx-periph: Fix switching CPU rate from
+ 300Mhz to 1.2GHz
+
+Switching the CPU from the L2 or L3 frequencies (300 and 200 Mhz
+respectively) to L0 frequency (1.2 Ghz) requires a significant amount
+of time to let VDD stabilize to the appropriate voltage. This amount of
+time is large enough that it cannot be covered by the hardware
+countdown register. Due to this, the CPU might start operating at L0
+before the voltage is stabilized, leading to CPU stalls.
+
+To work around this problem, we prevent switching directly from the
+L2/L3 frequencies to the L0 frequency, and instead switch to the L1
+frequency in-between. The sequence therefore becomes:
+
+1. First switch from L2/L3(200/300MHz) to L1(600MHZ)
+2. Sleep 20ms for stabling VDD voltage
+3. Then switch from L1(600MHZ) to L0(1200Mhz).
+
+It is based on the work done by Ken Ma <make at marvell.com>
+
+Cc: stable at vger.kernel.org
+Fixes: 2089dc33ea0e ("clk: mvebu: armada-37xx-periph: add DVFS support for cpu clocks")
+Signed-off-by: Gregory CLEMENT <gregory.clement at bootlin.com>
+Signed-off-by: Stephen Boyd <sboyd at kernel.org>
+---
+ drivers/clk/mvebu/armada-37xx-periph.c | 38 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++
+ 1 file changed, 38 insertions(+)
+
+--- a/drivers/clk/mvebu/armada-37xx-periph.c
++++ b/drivers/clk/mvebu/armada-37xx-periph.c
+@@ -35,6 +35,7 @@
+ #define CLK_SEL		0x10
+ #define CLK_DIS		0x14
+ 
++#define  ARMADA_37XX_DVFS_LOAD_1 1
+ #define LOAD_LEVEL_NR	4
+ 
+ #define ARMADA_37XX_NB_L0L1	0x18
+@@ -507,6 +508,40 @@ static long clk_pm_cpu_round_rate(struct
+ 	return -EINVAL;
+ }
+ 
++/*
++ * Switching the CPU from the L2 or L3 frequencies (300 and 200 Mhz
++ * respectively) to L0 frequency (1.2 Ghz) requires a significant
++ * amount of time to let VDD stabilize to the appropriate
++ * voltage. This amount of time is large enough that it cannot be
++ * covered by the hardware countdown register. Due to this, the CPU
++ * might start operating at L0 before the voltage is stabilized,
++ * leading to CPU stalls.
++ *
++ * To work around this problem, we prevent switching directly from the
++ * L2/L3 frequencies to the L0 frequency, and instead switch to the L1
++ * frequency in-between. The sequence therefore becomes:
++ * 1. First switch from L2/L3(200/300MHz) to L1(600MHZ)
++ * 2. Sleep 20ms for stabling VDD voltage
++ * 3. Then switch from L1(600MHZ) to L0(1200Mhz).
++ */
++static void clk_pm_cpu_set_rate_wa(unsigned long rate, struct regmap *base)
++{
++	unsigned int cur_level;
++
++	if (rate != 1200 * 1000 * 1000)
++		return;
++
++	regmap_read(base, ARMADA_37XX_NB_CPU_LOAD, &cur_level);
++	cur_level &= ARMADA_37XX_NB_CPU_LOAD_MASK;
++	if (cur_level <= ARMADA_37XX_DVFS_LOAD_1)
++		return;
++
++	regmap_update_bits(base, ARMADA_37XX_NB_CPU_LOAD,
++			   ARMADA_37XX_NB_CPU_LOAD_MASK,
++			   ARMADA_37XX_DVFS_LOAD_1);
++	msleep(20);
++}
++
+ static int clk_pm_cpu_set_rate(struct clk_hw *hw, unsigned long rate,
+ 			       unsigned long parent_rate)
+ {
+@@ -537,6 +572,9 @@ static int clk_pm_cpu_set_rate(struct cl
+ 			 */
+ 			reg = ARMADA_37XX_NB_CPU_LOAD;
+ 			mask = ARMADA_37XX_NB_CPU_LOAD_MASK;
++
++			clk_pm_cpu_set_rate_wa(rate, base);
++
+ 			regmap_update_bits(base, reg, mask, load_level);
+ 
+ 			return rate;
diff --git a/target/linux/mvebu/patches-4.14/511-clk-mvebu-armada-37xx-periph-Fix-wrong-return-value-.patch b/target/linux/mvebu/patches-4.14/511-clk-mvebu-armada-37xx-periph-Fix-wrong-return-value-.patch
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000..389a13a2b4
--- /dev/null
+++ b/target/linux/mvebu/patches-4.14/511-clk-mvebu-armada-37xx-periph-Fix-wrong-return-value-.patch
@@ -0,0 +1,33 @@
+From 616bf80d381da13fbb392ebff06f46f946e3ee84 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
+From: Gregory CLEMENT <gregory.clement at bootlin.com>
+Date: Fri, 13 Jul 2018 12:27:26 +0200
+Subject: [PATCH] clk: mvebu: armada-37xx-periph: Fix wrong return value in
+ get_parent
+
+The return value of the get_parent operation is a u8, whereas a -EINVAL
+was returned. This wrong value was return if the value was bigger that
+the number of parent but this case was already handled by the core.
+
+So we can just remove this chunk of code to fix the issue.
+
+Reported-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter at oracle.com>
+Fixes: 9818a7a4fd10 ("clk: mvebu: armada-37xx-periph: prepare cpu clk to
+be used with DVFS")
+Signed-off-by: Gregory CLEMENT <gregory.clement at bootlin.com>
+Signed-off-by: Stephen Boyd <sboyd at kernel.org>
+---
+ drivers/clk/mvebu/armada-37xx-periph.c | 3 ---
+ 1 file changed, 3 deletions(-)
+
+--- a/drivers/clk/mvebu/armada-37xx-periph.c
++++ b/drivers/clk/mvebu/armada-37xx-periph.c
+@@ -429,9 +429,6 @@ static u8 clk_pm_cpu_get_parent(struct c
+ 		val &= pm_cpu->mask_mux;
+ 	}
+ 
+-	if (val >= num_parents)
+-		return -EINVAL;
+-
+ 	return val;
+ }
+ 
diff --git a/target/linux/mvebu/patches-4.14/512-clk-mvebu-armada-37xx-periph-Remove-unused-var-num_p.patch b/target/linux/mvebu/patches-4.14/512-clk-mvebu-armada-37xx-periph-Remove-unused-var-num_p.patch
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000..874f982bd7
--- /dev/null
+++ b/target/linux/mvebu/patches-4.14/512-clk-mvebu-armada-37xx-periph-Remove-unused-var-num_p.patch
@@ -0,0 +1,33 @@
+From 8927c27b32703e28041ae19bf25ea53461be83a1 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
+From: Anders Roxell <anders.roxell at linaro.org>
+Date: Fri, 27 Jul 2018 00:27:21 +0200
+Subject: [PATCH] clk: mvebu: armada-37xx-periph: Remove unused var num_parents
+MIME-Version: 1.0
+Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
+Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
+
+When building armada-37xx-periph, num_parents isn't used in function
+clk_pm_cpu_get_parent:
+drivers/clk/mvebu/armada-37xx-periph.c: In function ‘clk_pm_cpu_get_parent’:
+drivers/clk/mvebu/armada-37xx-periph.c:419:6: warning: unused variable ‘num_parents’ [-Wunused-variable]
+  int num_parents = clk_hw_get_num_parents(hw);
+      ^~~~~~~~~~~
+Remove the declaration of num_parents to dispose the warning.
+
+Fixes: 616bf80d381d ("clk: mvebu: armada-37xx-periph: Fix wrong return value in get_parent")
+Signed-off-by: Anders Roxell <anders.roxell at linaro.org>
+Signed-off-by: Stephen Boyd <sboyd at kernel.org>
+---
+ drivers/clk/mvebu/armada-37xx-periph.c | 1 -
+ 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)
+
+--- a/drivers/clk/mvebu/armada-37xx-periph.c
++++ b/drivers/clk/mvebu/armada-37xx-periph.c
+@@ -419,7 +419,6 @@ static unsigned int armada_3700_pm_dvfs_
+ static u8 clk_pm_cpu_get_parent(struct clk_hw *hw)
+ {
+ 	struct clk_pm_cpu *pm_cpu = to_clk_pm_cpu(hw);
+-	int num_parents = clk_hw_get_num_parents(hw);
+ 	u32 val;
+ 
+ 	if (armada_3700_pm_dvfs_is_enabled(pm_cpu->nb_pm_base)) {
-- 
2.20.1


_______________________________________________
openwrt-devel mailing list
openwrt-devel at lists.openwrt.org
https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel


More information about the openwrt-devel mailing list