[OpenWrt-Devel] Lantiq DTS rename
daniel at makrotopia.org
Sun Dec 15 12:11:05 EST 2019
On Sun, Dec 15, 2019 at 05:53:42PM +0100, mail at adrianschmutzler.de wrote:
> how would you call the SOC variable in image Makefile then? (the equivalent to ATH_SOC and MTK_SOC...)
In a way those variables should be unified into something like 'SOC'...
For now, maybe 'LTQ_SOC' will do until we replace them all by 'SOC' and
that should be it...
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: openwrt-devel [mailto:openwrt-devel-bounces at lists.openwrt.org]
> > On Behalf Of Hauke Mehrtens
> > Sent: Sonntag, 15. Dezember 2019 14:49
> > To: Daniel Golle <daniel at makrotopia.org>; mail at adrianschmutzler.de
> > Cc: Martin Blumenstingl <martin.blumenstingl at googlemail.com>; openwrt-
> > devel at lists.openwrt.org
> > Subject: Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] Lantiq DTS rename
> > On 12/15/19 2:27 PM, Daniel Golle wrote:
> > > Hi Adrian,
> > >
> > > On Sun, Dec 15, 2019 at 02:10:14PM +0100, mail at adrianschmutzler.de
> > wrote:
> > >> Hi,
> > >>
> > >> I consider doing a DTS rename for lantiq target similar to what it's like on
> > ath79 and what I did for ramips earlier that year.
> > >>
> > >> However, I wonder whether the "soc_vendor_model.dts" scheme is
> > useful there, or whether it wouldn't be better to just use
> > "vendor_model.dts" ...
> > >>
> > >> Any thoughts on this or any NAK in general?
> > >
> > > soc_vendor_model should be appropriate here is well. why not?
> > Yes please clean this up and use the soc_vendor_model model, I think this is
> > the common format in the Linux kernel.
> > Be aware that there is a pull request from Martin pending with some changes
> > to the existing files:
> > https://github.com/openwrt/openwrt/pull/2216
> > Please also move the dts files into the lantiq subfolder at
> > arch/mips/boot/dts/lantiq/
> > Hauke
openwrt-devel mailing list
openwrt-devel at lists.openwrt.org
More information about the openwrt-devel