[OpenWrt-Devel] [PATCH 2/5] ath79: ubnt-bullet-m-xw: Move common DTS bits into XW include file

Mathias Kresin dev at kresin.me
Wed Dec 12 07:27:17 EST 2018


Hey Petr,

find my comments inline.

Mathias

10/12/2018 23:46, Petr Štetiar:
> Most of the M/XW platform settings can be shared so move those common
> DTS bits into include file.
> 
> Tested-by: Joe Ayers <ae6xe at arrl.net>
> Signed-off-by: Petr Štetiar <ynezz at true.cz>
> ---
>   target/linux/ath79/dts/ar9342_ubnt_bullet-m-xw.dts | 11 +++--------
>   target/linux/ath79/dts/ar9342_ubnt_xw.dtsi         |  8 ++++++++
>   2 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/target/linux/ath79/dts/ar9342_ubnt_bullet-m-xw.dts b/target/linux/ath79/dts/ar9342_ubnt_bullet-m-xw.dts
> index ad98075..7e4862e 100644
> --- a/target/linux/ath79/dts/ar9342_ubnt_bullet-m-xw.dts
> +++ b/target/linux/ath79/dts/ar9342_ubnt_bullet-m-xw.dts
> @@ -15,20 +15,19 @@
>   	status = "okay";
>   
>   	phy-mask = <4>;
> +
>   	phy4: ethernet-phy at 4 {
> -		phy-mode = "rgmii";
>   		reg = <4>;
> +		phy-mode = "rgmii";
>   	};
>   };

Unrelated noop change. Please drop it.

>   
>   &eth0 {
>   	status = "okay";
>   
> -	pll-data = <0x06000000 0x00000101 0x00001313>;

You drop the pll-data without adding them to the dtsi. This looks wrong 
and doesn't match the "move from dts to dtsi" from the commit message.

> -	mtd-mac-address = <&eeprom 0x0>;
> -
>   	phy-mode = "rgmii";
>   	phy-handle = <&phy4>;
> +	mtd-mac-address = <&eeprom 0x0>;
>   
>   	gmac-config {
>   		device = <&gmac>;
> @@ -36,7 +35,3 @@
>   		rxdv-delay = <3>;
>   	};
>   };
> -
> -&eth1 {
> -	status = "disabled";
> -};
> diff --git a/target/linux/ath79/dts/ar9342_ubnt_xw.dtsi b/target/linux/ath79/dts/ar9342_ubnt_xw.dtsi
> index 742df11..812810f 100644
> --- a/target/linux/ath79/dts/ar9342_ubnt_xw.dtsi
> +++ b/target/linux/ath79/dts/ar9342_ubnt_xw.dtsi
> @@ -117,3 +117,11 @@
>   	mtd-cal-data = <&eeprom 0x1000>;
>   	mtd-mac-address = <&eeprom 0x1002>;
>   };
> +
> +&mdio1 {
> +	status = "disabled";
> +};

This one is new and therefore doesn't match what is described in the 
commit message.

> +
> +&eth1 {
> +	status = "disabled";
> +};
> 


_______________________________________________
openwrt-devel mailing list
openwrt-devel at lists.openwrt.org
https://lists.openwrt.org/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel


More information about the openwrt-devel mailing list