[OpenWrt-Devel] [LEDE-DEV] openwrt and lede - remerge proposal V2

John Crispin john at phrozen.org
Wed May 24 05:01:33 EDT 2017

On 24/05/17 10:13, Paul Oranje wrote:
> Who are/will be entitled to an [IRC] project cloak ?
> Paul
people with voting rights and probably also regular contributors ... 
that is however unrelated to the remerge discussion and would fall under 
the normal voting system

>> Op 22 mei 2017, om 19:11 heeft Imre Kaloz <kaloz at openwrt.org> het volgende geschreven:
>> Hi,
>> On 2017-05-22 03:10, John Crispin wrote:
>>> On 22/05/17 11:02, Rafał Miłecki wrote:
>>>> On 05/22/2017 09:40 AM, John Crispin wrote:
>>>>> *) branding
>>>>> - the owrt side sees no option of using the lede brand
>>>>> - a (minor) majority voted for openwrt as a name over lede whilst most people said they did not care
>>>>> - as the last vote had a 100% ACK for a remerge using the owrt brand is the only feasible option
>>>> Since the project is going to be known/accessible under OpenWrt name now, I
>>>> want also mbm and Kaloz to share #openwrt and #openwrt-devel privileges.
>>>> There were many times op was needed but mbm/Kaloz weren't around.
>>>> I was refused/ignored multiple times when asking for that, so I wanted to
>>>> bring it as this point to be clear. Is that OK for you guys?
>>> i'll add it to V3
>> Sorry Rafal, don't get me wrong but this isn't true. It might haven't been documented well (like quite a few things) but you have been told years ago: everyone who has a project cloak has access to everything. What have been refused is to make a special exception just for you to get it without that.
>> Imre
>> _______________________________________________
>> Lede-dev mailing list
>> Lede-dev at lists.infradead.org
>> http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/lede-dev
openwrt-devel mailing list
openwrt-devel at lists.openwrt.org

More information about the openwrt-devel mailing list