[OpenWrt-Devel] Introducing the LEDE project

Daniel Dickinson openwrt at daniel.thecshore.com
Thu May 5 11:24:52 EDT 2016


On 16-05-05 11:11 AM, John Clark wrote:
>>>the sudden deletion of our widely published openwrt.org email
> addresses somewhat undermines this
> 
> Just so I am not jumping to wrong conclusions, their *.openwrt.org email

@openwrt.org actually

> addresses were deleted in retaliation for forking OpenWrt? Seriously? 

Yep.

> How did you not think that wasn't going to go well after all they have
> done for OpenWrt?

I think you mean "How did you think that wasn't *not* going to go well
after all they have done for OpenWrt".

Regards,

Daniel

> 
> --John
> 
> 
> On 5/5/16 11:04 AM, Roman Yeryomin wrote:
>> On 5 May 2016 at 17:43, Daniel Dickinson
>> <openwrt at daniel.thecshore.com> wrote:
>>> On 16-05-05 05:34 AM, Roman Yeryomin wrote:
>>>> On 5 May 2016 at 06:48, Daniel Dickinson
>>>> <openwrt at daniel.thecshore.com> wrote:
>>>>> On 16-05-04 04:01 PM, mbm wrote:
>>>>>> Dear OpenWrt community,
>>>>>>
>>> [snip]
>>>> One simple question:
>>>> If LEDE team members are the ones who were suffering from some
>>>> non-democratic decisions, why didn't they bring it to public
>>>> discussion for community? At least on devel maillist?
>>>>
>>>> If it was clear problem in remaining OpenWrt team then LEDE would win
>>>> the community right away or maybe problematic people would just go
>>>> away. Either way it would be more fair and open. And this is one of my
>>>> biggest concerns - LEDE team is promoting openness but didn't do their
>>>> moves openly (looking at maillists it seems they were hiding it for
>>>> month at least). Hate double standards.
>>> Perhaps for fear of repercussions such as what has happened since the
>>> fork where all LEDE members @openwrt.org email addresses have been
>>> deleted?
>> AFAIK, that was done after LEDE announcement but IMO was a wrong move
>> anyway.
>>
>>> There are a number of people in the LEDE group I've found to be pretty
>>> decent people, and great to work with, so I find it unlikely that they
>>> simply acted without good reason.
>> This only add more shock to the announcement.
>>
>> Regards,
>> Roman
>> _______________________________________________
>> openwrt-devel mailing list
>> openwrt-devel at lists.openwrt.org
>> https://lists.openwrt.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
> _______________________________________________
> openwrt-devel mailing list
> openwrt-devel at lists.openwrt.org
> https://lists.openwrt.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel
_______________________________________________
openwrt-devel mailing list
openwrt-devel at lists.openwrt.org
https://lists.openwrt.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openwrt-devel


More information about the openwrt-devel mailing list